Mitigation measures for telecommunication installations
PART 2: CASE STUDIES
Case study # |
1.6 |
Download
PDF ( ) |
Title |
Electric fence interference
|
Type of trouble |
Acoustic noise, degradation, abnormal operation, loss function. |
Source of trouble |
Electric fences used to protect property or keep animals contained generally use a high voltage (8 kV) impulse (ms) to energize the fence at intervals of about 1 second. Noise/EMC. |
System affected |
Customer's equipment, office equipment, access network. |
Location |
Customer premises, telecommunication centre. |
Keywords |
Immunity, common mode chokes, screening, filtering.
|
Version date |
2004-01-01 |
System configuration |
A normal PSTN or ISDN telephone line can be
affected. Close proximity to the source generally results in
noise being generated (on buried and aerial telephone cables
running parallel to the electric fence) up to a few tens of
metres away.
|
Searching techniques |
Detection is simple, as regular clicks,
every second, can be heard on the telephone, or data errors
are received at regular intervals. |
Mitigation method/Results/Conclusion |
A number of mitigation methods are
available in such circumstances. Ideally, the problem should
be solved at the noise source.
The installation of the electric fence should be checked
to ensure that it meets the manufacturer's guidelines: the
generator earth should be remote from any other power earths
and of low enough resistance so as not to cause excessive
step potential (< 200 V, 1 m from the earth point). The fence
should be installed on suitable insulation; vegetation should
not touch (should be cut back) the fence wires; in areas of
high earth resistivity, a base wire connected to the
generator earth point should be installed; alternating the
fence wires forming the fence (e.g., from the bottom to the
top – earth/HV/earth/HV) can help reduce stray currents and
provide a more effective fence; sitting the generator mid-way
along the parallel section of the route and energizing the
fence in both directions can help minimize inductive effects;
avoiding making a total loop around a field with the wire
(break inserted at a post) can reduce loop antenna effects.
If the above does not succeed or the fence owner is
uncooperative, then mitigation measures need to be taken on
the telephone system. First, ensure that the cable balance of
the network is at least 60 dB; otherwise, mitigation measures
will not be as effective. Most electric fence interference
affects the customer end-terminal equipment. The fitting of a
choke and drain circuit will in most instances cure the
problem (Note that a connection to earth is necessary for the
drain to be effective.). See Rec. ITU‑T K.37. In the small
number of instances where the telecommunication centre
equipment is being overloaded by the induced impulses, then
the fitting of 100 mH common mode chokes can be quite
effective. If the telecom cable has a screen available along
the section parallel to the fence, then ensure it is earthed
at each end, and at a few intermediate points of the
parallelism. The filters described above are generally very
effective, especially with services such as pair-gain or ISDN
(see Rec. ITU-T K.37). |
References |
Rec. ITU-T K.37; Annexes A and B. |
|
|