Committed to connecting the world

  •  
ITU GSR 2024

ITU-T work programme

Home : ITU-T Home : ITU-T Work Programme : X.1241     
  ITU-T A.5 justification information for referenced document IETF RFC 1939 (1996) in draft X.1241
1. Clear description of the referenced document:
Name: IETF RFC 1939 (1996)
Title: Post Office Protocol - Version 3, May 1996
2. Status of approval:
The referred RFCs were approved by IESG (Internet Engineering Steering Group).
3. Justification for the specific reference:
Draft Rec.X.fcs refers to abstract part ofIETF RFC 1939 (May 1996)
4. Current information, if any, about IPR issues:
Information on IPR issues regarding RFCs is available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/. Specifically: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=rfc_search&rfc_search=1939
5. Other useful information describing the "Quality" of the document:
The status of all the referred RFCs is "Proposed Standard".
6. The degree of stability or maturity of the document:
The status of all the referred RFCs is "Proposed Standard".
7. Relationship with other existing or emerging documents:
References within the referenced RFCs are listed under item (8).
8. Any explicit references within that referenced document should also be listed:
[1] Postel, J., "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol", STD 10, RFC 821, USC/Information Sciences Institute, August 1982./
[2] Crocker, D., "Standard for the Format of ARPA-Internet Text Messages", STD 11, RFC 822, University of Delaware, August 1982./
[3] Rivest, R., "The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm", RFC 1321, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, April 1992./
[4] Crispin, M., "Internet Message Access Protocol - Version 4", RFC 1730, University of Washington, December 1994./
[5] Myers, J., "POP3 AUTHentication command", RFC 1734, Carnegie Mellon, December 1994./
9. Qualification of ISOC/IETF:
9.1-9.6     Decisions of ITU Council to admit ISOC to participate in the work of the Sector (June 1995 and June 1996).
9.7     The Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) is responsible for ongoing maintenance of the RFCs when the need arises. Comments on RFCs and corresponding changes are accommodated through the existing standardization process.
9.8     Each revision of a given RFC has a different RFC number, so no confusion is possible. All RFCs always remain available on-line. An index of RFCs and their status may be found in the IETF archives at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
10. Other (for any supplementary information):
None
Note: This form is based on Recommendation ITU-T A.5