|
1.
|
Clear description of the referenced document:
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Status of approval:
|
|
|
The referred specifications were approved by W3C as Recommendations or notes.
|
|
3.
|
Justification for the specific reference:
|
|
|
Draft Rec. X.websec-1 uses Character Model for the World Wide Web 1.0: Fundamentals as described in W3C Character1.0:2005 for data encoding.
|
|
4.
|
Current information, if any, about IPR issues:
|
|
|
W3C is a Royalty Free organization. An on-line identification of patent policy is available at the following URL: http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/
|
|
5.
|
Other useful information describing the "Quality" of the document:
|
|
|
The status of all the referred specifications is "approved specification".
|
|
6.
|
The degree of stability or maturity of the document:
|
|
|
The status of all the referred specifications is "approved specification".
|
|
7.
|
Relationship with other existing or emerging documents:
|
|
|
References within the referenced specifications are listed under item (8).
|
|
8.
|
Any explicit references within that referenced document should also be listed:
|
|
|
Normative References/
IANA/
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority, Official Names for Character Sets. (See http://www.iana.org/assignments/character-sets.) /
ISO/IEC 10646/
ISO/IEC 10646:2003, Information technology -- Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS), as, from time to time, amended, replaced by a new edition or expanded by the addition of new parts. (See http://www.iso.org/iso/en/ISOOnline.openerpage for the latest version.)/
MIME-entity/
N. Freed, N. Borenstein, Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME). Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies, RFC 2045, November 1996, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2045.txt./
MIME-charset/
Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME). Part Two: Media Types, N. Freed, N. Borenstein, RFC 2046, November 1996, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2046.txt./
RFC 2119/
S. Bradner, Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels, IETF RFC 2119. (See http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt.) /
Unicode/
The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode Standard, Version 4, ISBN 0-321-18578-1, as updated from time to time by the publication of new versions. (See http://www.unicode.org/unicode/standard/versions for the latest version and additional information on versions of the standard and of the Unicode Character Database)./
Unicode 3.2/
The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode Standard, Version 3.2.0 is defined by The Unicode Standard, Version 3.0 (Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 2000. ISBN 0-201-61633-5), as amended by the Unicode Standard Annex #27: Unicode 3.1 (see http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr27) and by the Unicode Standard Annex #28: Unicode 3.2 (see http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr28)./
Unicode 4.0/
The Unicode Consortium. The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 2003. ISBN 0-321-18578-1. (See http://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode4.0.0/)/
/
Other References/
CharNorm/
Martin J. Dürst, François Yergeau, Richard Ishida, Misha Wolf, Tex Texin, Addison Phillips Character Model for the World Wide Web 1.0: Normalization, W3C Working Draft. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod-norm.) /
CharIRI/
Martin J. Dürst, François Yergeau, Richard Ishida, Misha Wolf, Tex Texin, Character Model for the World Wide Web 1.0: Resource Identifiers, W3C Candidate Recommendation. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/charmod-resid.) /
CharReq/
Martin J. Dürst, Requirements for String Identity Matching and String Indexing, W3C Working Draft. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-charreq.) /
Connolly/
D. Connolly, Character Set Considered Harmful, W3C Note. (See http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/html-spec/charset-harmful.)/
CSS2/
Bert Bos, Håkon Wium Lie, Chris Lilley, Ian Jacobs, Eds., Cascading Style Sheets, level 2 (CSS2 Specification), W3C Recommendation. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2.) /
DOM Level 1/
Vidur Apparao et al., Document Object Model (DOM) Level 1 Specification, W3C Recommendation. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-DOM-Level-1.) /
HTML 4.0/
Dave Raggett, Arnaud Le Hors, Ian Jacobs, Eds., HTML 4.0 Specification, W3C Recommendation, 18-Dec-1997 (See http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40-971218.)/
HTML 4.01/
Dave Raggett, Arnaud Le Hors, Ian Jacobs, Eds., HTML 4.01 Specification, W3C Recommendation. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/html401.) /
ISO/IEC 646/
ISO/IEC 646:1991, Information technology -- ISO 7-bit coded character set for information interchange. This standard defines an International Reference Version (IRV) which corresponds exactly to what is widely known as ASCII or US-ASCII. ISO/IEC 646 was based on the earlier standard ECMA-6. ECMA has maintained its standard up to date with respect to ISO/IEC 646 and makes an electronic copy available at http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-006.htm /
ISO/IEC 9541-1/
ISO/IEC 9541-1:1991, Information technology -- Font information interchange -- Part 1: Architecture. (See http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=17277 for the latest version.) /
ISO/IEC 14651/
ISO/IEC 14651:2000, Information technology -- International string ordering and comparison -- Method for comparing character strings and description of the common template tailorable ordering as, from time to time, amended, replaced by a new edition or expanded by the addition of new parts. (See http://www.iso.org/iso/en/ISOOnline.openerpage for the latest version.)/
MathML2/
David Carlisle, Patrick Ion, Robert Miner, Nico Poppelier, Eds., Mathematical Markup Language (MathML) Version 2.0, W3C Recommendation. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2.) /
Nicol/
Gavin Nicol, The Multilingual World Wide Web, Chapter 2: The WWW As A Multilingual Application. (See http://www.mind-to-mind.com/library/papers/multilingual/multilingual-www.html.) /
RFC 2070/
F. Yergeau, G. Nicol, G. Adams, M. Dürst, Internationalization of the Hypertext Markup Language, IETF RFC 2070, January 1997. (See http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2070.txt.)/
RFC 2277/
H. Alvestrand, IETF Policy on Character Sets and Languages, IETF RFC 2277, BCP 18, January 1998. (See http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2277.txt.) /
RFC 2978/
N. Freed, J. Postel, IANA Charset Registration Procedures, IETF RFC 2978, BCP 19, October 2000. (See http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2978.txt.) /
RFC 3629/
F. Yergeau, UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646, IETF RFC 3629, STD 63, November 2003. (See http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3629.txt.) /
RFC 2781/
P. Hoffman, F. Yergeau, UTF-16, an encoding of ISO 10646, IETF RFC 2781, February 2000. (See http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2781.txt.)/
SPREAD/
SPREAD - Standardization Project for East Asian Documents Universal Public Entity Set. (See http://www.ascc.net/xml/resource/entities/index.html) /
SVG/
Jon Ferraiolo, ?? ? (FUJISAWA Jun), Dean Jackson, Ed., Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) 1.1 Specification, W3C Recommendation. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG.) /
UTR #10/
Mark Davis, Ken Whistler, Unicode Collation Algorithm, Unicode Technical Report #10. (See http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr10.) /
UTR #17/
Ken Whistler, Mark Davis, Character Encoding Model, Unicode Technical Report #17. (See http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr17.) /
UTR #29/
Mark Davis, Text Boundaries, Unicode Standard Annex #29. (See http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr29 for the latest version)./
UXML/
Martin Dürst and Asmus Freytag, Unicode in XML and other Markup Languages, Unicode Technical Report #20 and W3C Note. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/unicode-xml.)/
XML 1.0/
Tim Bray, Jean Paoli, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, Eve Maler, François Yergeau, Eds., Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0, W3C Recommendation. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml.) /
XML Japanese Profile/
MURATA Makoto Ed., XML Japanese Profile, W3C Note. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/japanese-xml.) /
XPath/
James Clark, Steve DeRose, Eds, XML Path Language (XPath) Version 1.0, W3C Recommendation. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath.)/
|
|
9.
|
Qualification of
W3C:
|
|
|
W3C is qualified for including references in ITU-T Recommendations under Recommendation A.5 procedures.
|
|
10.
|
Other (for any supplementary information):
|
|
|
All standards are available on-line. An index of Recommendation and their status may be found in the W3C archives at http://www.w3.org/TR/ .
|
|
