Committed to connecting the world

  •  
ITU GSR 2024

ITU-T work programme

Home : ITU-T Home : ITU-T Work Programme : Q.3640     
  ITU-T A.5 justification information for referenced document IETF RFC 3264 (2002) in draft Q.3640
1. Clear description of the referenced document:
Name: IETF RFC 3264 (2002)
Title: An Offer/Answer Model with the Session Description Protocol (SDP). June 2002
2. Status of approval:
Normative
3. Justification for the specific reference:
It is used as a reference in the Recommendation ITU-T Q.30xx_VoLTE_Interconnection_FW
4. Current information, if any, about IPR issues:
Information on IPR issues regarding RFCs is available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/. Specifically: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=rfc_search&rfc_search=3264
5. Other useful information describing the "Quality" of the document:
This RFC has been in existence since June 2002. Updated by RFC 6157
6. The degree of stability or maturity of the document:
RFC 3264 was published in June, 2002. It is a standards-track document and is currently in the "Proposed Standard" state.
7. Relationship with other existing or emerging documents:
RFC 3264 is a basic component of the basic suite of internet protocols and standards and is widely used by the internet community. Also, it is referenced in V.152.
8. Any explicit references within that referenced document should also be listed:
[1] Handley, M. and V. Jacobson, "SDP: Session Description Protocol", RFC 2327, April 1998./
[2] Bradner, S., "Key Words for Use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997./
[3] Kumar, R. and M. Mostafa, "Conventions For the Use of The Session Description Protocol (SDP) for ATM Bearer Connections", RFC 3108, May 2001./
[4] Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S, Frederick, R. and V. Jacobson, "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications", RFC 1889, January 1996./
[5] Schulzrinne, H., "RTP Profile for Audio and Video Conferences with Minimal Control", RFC 1890, January 1996./
[6] Handley, M., Perkins, C. and E. Whelan, "Session Announcement Protocol", RFC 2974, October 2000./
[7] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M. and E. Schooler, "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261, June 2002./
[8] Schulzrinne, H., Rao, A. and R. Lanphier, "Real Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP)", RFC 2326, April 1998./
[9] Schulzrinne, H. and S. Petrack, "RTP Payload for DTMF Digits, Telephony Tones and Telephony Signals", RFC 2833, May 2000./
[10] Handley, M., Schulzrinne, H., Schooler, E. and J. Rosenberg, "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 2543, March 1999.
9. Qualification of ISOC/IETF:
9.1-9.6     Decisions of ITU Council to admit ISOC to participate in the work of the Sector (June 1995 and June 1996).
9.7     The Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) is responsible for ongoing maintenance of the RFCs when the need arises. Comments on RFCs and corresponding changes are accommodated through the existing standardization process.
9.8     Each revision of a given RFC has a different RFC number, so no confusion is possible. All RFCs always remain available on-line. An index of RFCs and their status may be found in the IETF archives at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
10. Other (for any supplementary information):
References should always be made to RFC numbers (and not by other designations such as STD, BCP, etc.). References not to be made to documents referred to as "Internet Drafts" or RFCs categorized as "Historic". Normative references should not be made to RFCs that are not standards, for example, "Informational" and "Experimental" RFCs.
Note: This form is based on Recommendation ITU-T A.5