|
1.
|
Clear description of the referenced document:
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Status of approval:
|
|
|
Approved as Proposed Standard (January 2012)
|
|
3.
|
Justification for the specific reference:
|
|
|
To allow H.245 to signal the support of the CLUE protocol and to establish a CLUE over WebRTC data channel which in turn uses SCTP / DTLS.
|
|
4.
|
Current information, if any, about IPR issues:
|
|
|
Information on IPR issues regarding RFCs is available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/. Specifically: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=rfc_search&rfc_search=6347
|
|
5.
|
Other useful information describing the "Quality" of the document:
|
|
|
RFC 6347 is a Standards Track document. This document has been reviewed extensively in IETF and widely used in real world. Updated by RFC 7507, RFC 7905, RFC 8996. Obsoletes RFC 4347. Errata exist.
|
|
6.
|
The degree of stability or maturity of the document:
|
|
|
RFC is a standards-track document.
|
|
7.
|
Relationship with other existing or emerging documents:
|
|
|
IETF has published many DTLS related documents.
|
|
8.
|
Any explicit references within that referenced document should also be listed:
|
|
|
Normative References/
[REQ] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997./
[RFC1191] Mogul, J. and S. Deering, "Path MTU discovery", RFC 1191, November 1990./
[RFC4301] Kent, S. and K. Seo, "Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol", RFC 4301, December 2005./
[RFC4443] Conta, A., Deering, S., and M. Gupta, Ed., "Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMPv6) for the Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Specification", RFC 4443, March 2006./
[RFC4821] Mathis, M. and J. Heffner, "Packetization Layer Path MTU Discovery", RFC 4821, March 2007./
[RFC6298] Paxson, V., Allman, M., Chu, J., and M. Sargent, "Computing TCP's Retransmission Timer", RFC 6298, June 2011./
[RSAGCM] Salowey, J., Choudhury, A., and D. McGrew, "AES Galois Counter Mode (GCM) Cipher Suites for TLS", RFC 5288, August 2008./
[TCP] Postel, J., "Transmission Control Protocol", STD 7, RFC 793, September 1981./
[TLS12] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246, August 2008./
Informative References/
[DCCP] Kohler, E., Handley, M., and S. Floyd, "Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP)", RFC 4340, March 2006./
[DCCPDTLS] Phelan, T., "Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) over the Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP)", RFC 5238, May 2008./
[DTLS] Modadugu, N. and E. Rescorla, "The Design and Implementation of Datagram TLS", Proceedings of ISOC NDSS 2004, February 2004./
[DTLS1] Rescorla, E. and N. Modadugu, "Datagram Transport Layer Security", RFC 4347, April 2006./
[ECCGCM] Rescorla, E., "TLS Elliptic Curve Cipher Suites with SHA-256/384 and AES Galois Counter Mode (GCM)", RFC 5289, August 2008./
[ESP] Kent, S., "IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)", RFC 4303, December 2005./
[IANA] IANA, "Transport Layer Security (TLS) Parameters", http://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-parameters./
[IKEv2] Kaufman, C., Hoffman, P., Nir, Y., and P. Eronen, "Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)", RFC 5996, September 2010./
[IMAP] Crispin, M., "INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION 4rev1", RFC 3501, March 2003./
[PHOTURIS] Karn, P. and W. Simpson, "Photuris: Session-Key Management Protocol", RFC 2522, March 1999./
[POP] Myers, J. and M. Rose, "Post Office Protocol - Version 3", STD 53, RFC 1939, May 1996./
[SIP] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E. Schooler, "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol", RFC 3261, June 2002./
[TLS] Dierks, T. and C. Allen, "The TLS Protocol Version 1.0", RFC 2246, January 1999./
[TLS11] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.1", RFC 4346, April 2006./
[WHYIPSEC] Bellovin, S., "Guidelines for Specifying the Use of IPsec Version 2", BCP 146, RFC 5406, February 2009.
|
|
9.
|
Qualification of
ISOC/IETF:
|
|
|
9.1-9.6 Decisions of ITU Council to admit ISOC to participate in the work of the Sector (June 1995 and June 1996).
9.7 The Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) is responsible for ongoing maintenance of the RFCs when the need arises. Comments on RFCs and corresponding changes are accommodated through the existing standardization process.
9.8 Each revision of a given RFC has a different RFC number, so no confusion is possible. All RFCs always remain available on-line. An index of RFCs and their status may be found in the IETF archives at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.
|
|
10.
|
Other (for any supplementary information):
|
|
|
This RFC specifies Version 1.2 of the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol. The TLS protocol provides communications security over the Internet. The protocol allows client/server applications to communicate in a way that is designed to prevent eavesdropping, tampering, or message forgery.
|
|
