Policy on Intellectual Property Right (IPR)
1 Introduction
2 Background
3 Existing and planned
capabilities of IMT that support broadband PPDR applications
3.1 Capabilities
of IMT systems to support broadband PPDR
3.2 Advantages of
LTE systems for PPDR agencies
3.2.1 Better
performance
3.2.2 Simplified,
IP-based architecture
What this means for public safety agencies: Unified
communications and enhanced day-to-day operations
3.2.3 Low
latency and low packet loss
What this means for public safety agencies: Streaming
video
3.2.4 Greater
interoperability
What this means for public safety agencies:
3.2.5 Security
What this means for public safety agencies:
3.2.6 Network
sharing
What this means for public safety agencies: Share
resources
3.2.7 Quality
of service and prioritization
What this means for public safety agencies:
3.2.8 Bandwidth
flexibility
What this means for public safety agencies:
3.2.9 Simultaneous
use of multiple applications and grade of service
3.2.10 Coverage
and spectrum usage/management
3.2.11 Capabilities
(e.g. talk group configuration)
3.3 Other IMT
capabilities
4 Approaches for supporting
broadband PPDR applications using IMT
5 Case studies of
applications of IMT to broadband PPDR
6 Summary
7 Acronyms, abbreviations
8 References
Annex 1 Examples of LTE technology capabilities which
can be used as a base to develop mission critical applications as currently
supported by narrowband PPDR technologies and services
Annex 2 Case study – An example of deployment of a
dedicated PPDR network owned and operated by a PPDR agency or controlling
entity, based on IMT in the United States of America
Annex 3 Case study – Broadband
wireless communications for public
safety in Japan
Annex 4 Case study – An example scenario of using LTE for PPDR at a chemical factory fire
1 Introduction
2 Summary of the incident
3 The incident time line
3.1 Event A1
3.2 Event A2
3.3 Event A3
3.4 Event A4
3.5 Event A5
3.6 Event A6
3.7 Event A7
3.8 Event A8
3.9 Event A9
3.10 Event A10
Annex 5 Case study: PPDR deployment strategy utilizing
partitioning of the service capacity on a national IMT network