|
| [COM11-D115] United States of America (Q9/11): Proposed "ANI" - ISN signalling arrangements and internal ACN-E signalling functionality definitions | |
| [COM11-D116] United States of America (Q9/11): Proposed isup "NNI" access establishment, add party, add connection, release party, release connection, and call release information flows revisions | |
| [COM11-D117] United States of America (Q9/11): New BICC capability - add party to existing connection | |
| [COM11-D118] United States of America (Q9/11): BICC capability set 3 - addition/removal of a connection to/from an existing call | |
| [COM11-D119] United States of America (Q9/11): BICC signalling requirements and call flows for MPLS in BICC CS 3 | |
| [COM11-D120] United States of America (Q9/11): Bearer control and bearer-level requirements for MPLS in BICC networks | |
| [COM11-D121] Lucent Technologies (USA), (Q9/11): Reconsideration of TRQ.2141.0 Annex C (MPLS) for BICC CS3 | |
| [COM11-D122] United States of America (Q12/11): Proposed BICC CS3 revision Recommendation Q.1903.4, clause 8.3 on codec negotiation | |
| [COM11-D123] United States of America (Q12/11): Proposed CS3 revisions to Q1903.4, 10.4 on mid- call modification and negotiation of codecs | |
| [COM11-D124] Lucent Technologies (USA), (13/11): Proposed API for Annex E to ITU-T Q.2111 | |
| [COM11-D125] United States of America (Q13/11): Need for an API for Annex e to ITU-T Q.2111 | |
| [COM11-D126] United States of America (13/11): Proposed revisions to Annex E to ITU-T Q.2111 | |
| [COM11-D127] France Telecom (Q1/11, 5/11): Support of IP-based addressing schemes in inap CS4 | |
| [COM11-D128] United States of America (Q9/11, 15/11): Request for origination service endpoint addresses in Q.2630.X | |
| [COM11-D129] United States of America (Q12/11): Signalling support for PNNI in Q.2941.X | |
| [COM11-D130] United States of America (Q9/11, 15/11): Signalling support in Q.2630.2 for AAL type 1 extensions for AALl type 2 interworking | |
| [COM11-D131] United States of America (Q1/11, 9/11): Proposed signalling flows for supporting special resource nodes | |
| [COM11-D132] United States of America (6/11, 9/11): Requirements for interworking between SIP/SIP-T and ISUP/BICC | |
| [COM11-D133] United States of America (Q6/11, 9/11): Interworking between IP cablecom and PSTN networks | |
| [COM11-D134] Cisco Systems (Q6/11, 9/11): Requirements for interworking between SIP/SIP-T and ISUP/BICC | |
| [COM11-D135] United States of America (Q9/11): Proposal for support of NCS to BICC interworking at the BICC access interface | |
| [COM11-D136] United States of America (Q9/11): BICC CS3 signalling requirements to support routing methods for international routing addresses (INRA) (recommendations E.351 and E.353) | |
| [COM11-D137] France Telecom (Q11/11): Order of octets in the BCTP header | |
| [COM11-D138] Siemens Switzerland LTD (Q10/11): Proposed liaison statement to itu-t Study Group 12 - Q9/12 | |
| [COM11-D139] United States of America (Q12/11): Signalling support in Q.2931 for AAL type 1 extensions for AAL type 2 interworking | |
| [COM11-D140] United States of America (Q12/11): Changes in Q.2931 to add signalling support for "AAL type 1 extensions for AAL type 2 interworking". | |
| [COM11-D141] United States of America (Q12/11): Editorial errors in Q.2931 Amendment 2. | |
| [COM11-D142] United States of America (Q11/11, 12/11): Proposal for BICC/ISUP protocol to support automatic re-routing (Crankback) | |
| [COM11-D143] United States of America (Q11/11): Proposed outlines for new recommendation of "interworking between SIP/SDP and BICC protocol" | |
| [COM11-D144] United States of America (Q11/11): Proposed Annex for Q.1912.SIP on SIP capabilities for BICC interworking | |
| [COM11-D145] United States of America (Q15/11): Changes in Q.2630.2 to add signalling support for "AAL type 1 extensions for AAL type 2 interworking" | |
| [COM11-D146] Australia (Q9/11): CSM referencing and modelling changes | |
| [COM11-D147] UK (Q2/11, Q3/11): Overview of VHE activities in 3G | |
| [COM11-D148] Siemens AG, Germany (Q9/11): Additional option "break before make" for bearer redirection in BICC CS3 | |
| [COM11-D149] Siemens AG, Germany (Q9/11): Mapping of codecs for IP bearers in BICC CS3 | |
| [COM11-D150] Siemens AG, Germany (Q9/11): Facsimile de-modulation / re-modulation for IP bearers in BICC CS3 | |
| [COM11-D151] Siemens AG, Germany (Q9/11): Mapping of data calls for IP bearers in BICC CS3 | |
| [COM11-D152] Siemens AG, Germany (Q11/11): Proposal for an Additional Party's Category in BICC CS3 and IS | |
| [COM11-D153] Siemens Atea N.V. (Q13/11): Comments on draft revised ITU-T Recommendation Q.714 | |
| [COM11-D154] Siemens Atea (Q13/11): Draft revised ITU-T Recommendation Q.715 | |
| [COM11-D155] Telecommunication Administration of the Russian Federation (Q9/11, 11/11): Suggestion on the usage of xDSL technologies within access networks to BICC | |
| [COM11-D155r1] Telecommunication Administration of the Russian Federation (Q9/11, 11/11): Suggestion on the usage of XDSL technologies within access networks to BICC | |
| [COM11-D156] UK (Q6/11): Development of new signalling and interworking recommendations for session initiation protocol. | |
| [COM11-D157] UK (Q11/11, 12/11): Clarification of the treatment of national use elements at international gateways | |
| [COM11-D158] UK (Q11/11, 12/11): Clarification of automatic congestion control procedures | |
| [COM11-D159r1] Siemens AG, Germany (Q11/11): BICC CS2 support of gateway call mediation nodes (Q.1902.4) | |
| [COM11-D160] KDDI Corporation (Q10/11): A proposal on control of Digital Multiplexing Equipment (DME) with Low-bit-rate Voice Codec (LVC) for tandem mode operation | |
| [COM11-D161] KDDI Corporation (Q12/11): Proposal on the avoidance of DME with LVC tandeming procedure for DSS1 | |
| [COM11-D162] Germany (Q6/11, 9/11, 13/11): Incorporation of IETF based protocols into draft J.165 (formerly J.ISTP) | |
| [COM11-D163] USA (Q9/11): BICC analogue loop protocol requirements for tone detection | |
| [COM11-D164] USA (Q9/11): BICC analogue loop protocol requirements for ringdown services | |
| [COM11-D165] USA (Q9/11): BICC analogue loop protocol requirements for FX services | |
| [COM11-D166] SBC communications (Q11/11): General approach for coding and procedures of the BICC access control protocol | |
| [COM11-D167] USA (Q11/11): Proposed protocol model for BICC access network | |
| [COM11-D168] USA (Q11/11): General approach for coding and procedures of the BICC Access Network Protocol | |
| [COM11-D169] USA (Q11/11): Discussion of user-ID (formerly CCA-ID) and connection ID for BICC access network protocol | |
| [COM11-D170] L.M. Ericsson (Q13/11): Balanced SCCP congestion control | |
| [COM11-D171] France Telecom (Q9/11, 11/11): Proposal for documentation of BICC/CBC interworking | |
| [COM11-D172] France Telecom (Q12/11): Introduction of the additional called party number parameter in the CCBS supplementary service | |
| [COM11-D173] France Telecom (Q9/11, 11/11, 12/11, 13/11): Questioning the hexa-decimal encoding of E.353 INRA | |
| [COM11-D174] USA (Q9/11): Clarifications to definitions for BICC access and access network requirements baseline | |
| [COM11-D175] Swisscom Ltd (Q13/11): Transport independent SCCP | |
| [COM11-D176] Swisscom Ltd (Q13/11): Proposed extensions to address parameter (TI-SCCP) | |
| [COM11-D177] Swisscom Ltd (Q13/11): Transport independent SCCP (exceptions to § 5/Q.714) | |
| [COM11-D178] Canada (Q8/11, 12/11, 13/11): Signalling aspects for ATM and multi-service over MPLS | |
| [COM11-D179] Canada (Q6/11, 7/11, 8/11, 12/11): Interworking signalling specifications | |
| [COM11-D180] Canada (6/11, 7/11, 8/11): Interworking of MPLS and ATM signalling | |
| [COM11-D181] Canada (Q6/11, 7/11, 8/11): Proposed update to draft Recommendation Q.MPLS | |
| [COM11-D182] Canada (Q6/11, 11/11, 12/11): A proposal that ITU-T SG 11 undertake activities to develop recommendations to facilitate interconnection of SIP networks with the PSTN/ISDN | |
| [COM11-D183] Canada (Q6/11, 11/11, 12/11): Proposed outline for draft recommendation Q.SIPPROF, "Sip Profile for Interworking with the ISDN" | |
| [COM11-D184] Canada (Q6/11, 11/11, 12/11): Proposed outline for draft Recommendation Q.ISUPSIP, "interworking between the signalling system No. 7 ISDN user part (ISUP) and the session initiation protocol" | |
| [COM11-D185] Siemens AG, Germany (Q9/11, 11/11): Support of end-to-end IP bearer connections in the BICC access network functional model | |
| [COM11-D186] USA (Q6/11, 9/11, 12/11): Framework for supporting IEPS in IP telephony | |
| [COM11-D187] USA (Q6/11, 9/11, 12/11): Functional requirements for priority services to support critical communications | |
| [COM11-D188] Nortel Networks (UK), (Q9/11, 11/11): Bearer control for ATM adaptation layer type 2 over ATM networks | |
| [COM11-D189] Nortel Networks (UK), (Q9/11, 11/11): Bearer redirection enhancements | |
| [COM11-D190] Nortel Networks, UK (Q6/11, 9/11, 11/11, 12/11): Scope of BICC CS3 | |
| [COM11-D191] Nortel Networks (UK), (Q9/11, 11/11): Roadmap for nortel networks (UK) BICC access contributions | |
| [COM11-D192] Nortel Networks (UK), (Q9/11, 11/11): BICC access: CSM protocol proposal | |
| [COM11-D193] Nortel Networks (UK), (Q8/11, 11/11): BICC access: ACF protocol proposal | |
| [COM11-D194] Nortel Networks (UK), (Q9/11, 11/11): BICC access bearer control requirements | |
| [COM11-D195] Nortel Networks (UK): BICC access:RMCF protocol - Analogue Terminal Control | |
| [COM11-D196] Marconi Communications Limited (Q4/11): Status report of API activities within ETSI/3GPP/Parlay/JAIN group | |
| [COM11-D197] NTT (Q4/11): Proposal for API Recommendation in Q.4/11 | |
| [COM11-D198] NTT (Q4/11): Proposed draft of API reference document | |
| [COM11-D199] NTT (Q5/11): Comments on SCF-SSF interface (Q.1248.2) draft | |
| [COM11-D200] NTT (Q5/11): Comments on SCF-SRF interface (Q.1248.3) draft | |
| [COM11-D201] LM Ericsson (Q9/11): Updates to TRQ BICC signalling transport requirements | |
| [COM11-D202] Federal Republic of Germany (Q9/11): International Emergency Preference Scheme (IEPS) | |
| [COM11-D203] Nortel Networks (UK), (Q6/11): Proposed new Recommendation on SIP profile for interworking with the ISDN (SIP-T) | |
| [COM11-D204] Ericsson (Q11/11): Annex X: user part support of the call bearer control interface draft new Annex X to Q.1950 | |
| [COM11-D205] NTT (Q11/11, 12/11): Proposal for supporting of pivot routing and redirection interacting with INAP | |
| [COM11-D206] NEC Corporation , NTT (Q7/11): Target of the Q 7/11 | |
| [COM11-D207] Alcatel SELl AG & KPN (Q9/11, 11/11): Need for SDP encoding for end-to-end QOS service control | |
| [COM11-D208] KPN (Q9/11, 11/11, 12/11): New cause value for anonymous call reject | |
| [COM11-D209] KPN (Q9/11, 11/11): Need for new identifier to correlate instances of parallel call control protocols | |
| [COM11-D210] KPN (Q6/11, 8/11, 9/11, 11/11): Support of IP QOS classes and IP transfer capabilities in IP signalling protocol(s) | |
| [COM11-D211] KPN (Q6/11, 8/11, 9/11, 11/11): Enhancement of the IP BCP protocol: IP QOS classes and IP transfer capabilities | |
| [COM11-D212] KPN (Q9/11, 11/11): Proposed Liaison Statement to ITU-T SG16 on a generic protocol mechanism for end-to-end QOS service control | |
| [COM11-D213] KPN (Q9/11, 11/11): Parallel use of BICC with other call control protocols | |
| [COM11-D214] KPN (Q9/11, 11/11): Proposed codings and procedures to be supported by the q.bicc protocol for end-to-end QOS service control | |
| [COM11-215] KPN (Q9/11, 11/11): Proposed codings and procedures to be supported by the Q.CBC protocol for end-to-end QOS service control | |
| [COM11-D216] KPN (Q6/11, 8/11, 9/11, 11/11): Framework for end-to-end QOS service control and network QOS control | |
| [COM11-D217] KPN (Q9/11, 11/11): ETSI tiphon reference material with QOS service classes and signalling requirements for end-to-end QOS service control | |
| [COM11-D218] KPN (Q9/11, 11/11): Background information on tiphon profile for BICC CS2 | |
| [COM11-D219] KPN (Q9/11, 11/11): Proposed detailed review of tiphon profile for BICC CS2 | |
| [COM11-D220] KPN (Q9/11, 11/11): Identification of relevant parts in tiphon base material for the support of end-to-end QOS service control in BICC CS3 | |
| [COM11-D221] KPN (Q9/11, 11/11): Translation of tiphon QOS information flows in signalling requirements to support end-to-end QOS service control | |
| [COM11-D222] KPN (Q9/11, 11/11): Enum support BICC CS3 with text-based (URL) naming transfer | |
| [COM11-D223] Nortel Networks (UK), (Q9/11, 11/11): BICC access: RMCF protocol proposal | |
| [COM11-D224] France Telecom (Q11/11): Proposal to split the generic bearer connection package into two packages | |
| [COM11-D225] Nortel Networks (UK), (Q11/11): References in Q.1950 for tone generation package | |
| [COM11-D226] Nortel Networks (UK), Marconi, France Telecom, Alcatel (Q11/11): Q.1950 BCP tunnelling enhancements | |
| [COM11-D227] France Telecom (Q2/11): Common user profile | |
| [COM11-D228] France Telecom (Q1/11, 2/11, 3/11, 4/11, 5/11): VHE work split and interactions between SG11 and SSG | |
| [COM11-D229] Swisscom (Q6/11, 7/11, 8/11, 9/11): Protocol architecture and requirements modelling using UML notation | |
| [COM11-D230] Swisscom AG (Q8/11): Possible new work items for Q8/11 | |
| [COM11-D231] Swisscom (Q8/11, 9/11): Approaches for signalling requirements in MPLS networks | |
