|
| List of Delayed Contributions (Meeting : 1-19 March 1999) | |
| [COM11-D1141] Siemens Switzerland LTD. (Q9/11): Q.SPNE versus Q.50, Q.ECD | |
| [COM11-D1142] Siemens Switzerland LTD. (Q9/11): Modification of the table of contents of the ITU-T Q-Series Recommendations (Q.50 - Q.59) | |
| [COM11-D1143] Siemens Switzerland LTD. (Q9/11): Proposed new ITU-T Rec.Q.ECD | |
| [COM11-D1144] Telecommunication Administration of the Russian Federation (Q SoI/11): Information flows for the Initial Functional Architecture for in support of the internet services | |
| [COM11-D1145] General Datacomm (Q20/11): Modification of Draft Q.2941.2 for AAL2 signalling | |
| [COM11-D1146] United States of America (Q13/11, Q20/11): Clarifications of Non-Switched Application of AAL Type 2 signaling protocol | |
| [COM11-D1147] United States of America (Q13/11): Proposed rewording of Draft Q.AAL2 | |
| [COM11-D1148] United States of America (Q8/11): Information flow for packet data session establishment | |
| [COM11-D1149] United States of America (Q5/11, Q22/11): IN CS-4 Interworking with B-ISDN: Information available in O_BCSM states | |
| [COM11-D1150] United States of America (Q5/11, Q22/11): IN CS-4 Interworking with B-ISDN: Information available in T_ BCSM states | |
| [COM11-D1151] United States of America (Q5/11, Q22/11): IN CS-4 Interworking with B-ISDN: BCSM detection point criteria | |
| [COM11-D1152] United States of America (Q5/11, Q22/11): IN CS-4 Interworking with B-ISDN: BCSM triggers | |
| [COM11-D1153] China MII (Q4/11, Q5/11): Using dataless SDL Graphic Representation describing Calling Card service | |
| [COM11-D1154] People’s Republic of China (QAll, SoI): Signalling support for RSVP over ATM | |
| [COM11-D1155] People’s Republic of China (QAll, SoI): Information flow for IN/internet interworking benchmark services | |
| [COM11-D1156] China MII (Q12/11): Modification about Q.784 | |
| [COM11-D1157] PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia (Q5/11): General requirements of Intelligent Network to support IP (Internet) Network based services | |
| [COM11-D1157R] PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia (Q5/11, SoI): General requirements of intelligent network tp support IP (Internet) network based services | |
| [COM11-D1158] Siemens Switzerland Ltd (Q9/11): Q.SPNE; SDLs for SPUP | |
| [COM11-D1159] Telia AB (Q12/11, Q16/11): Examples of service interaction scenarios for the TC-relay discussion | |
| [COM11-D1160] Telia AB (Q12/11): Proposal for supplementary service interaction text GVNS - CCBS | |
| [COM11-D1161] United States of America (Q13/11, Q2/11, Q16/11): Comments on B-ISUP procedures for user part unavailability cause "user part unavailability - unknown" | |
| [COM11-D1162] United States of America (Q5/11, Q22/11, SoI): Interaction between SCF in domain with IP SCF in the IP domain | |
| [COM11-D1163] KPN (Q12/11, Q10/11, Q16/11, Q22/11, Q25/11): Non-circuit related signalling functionality for number portability | |
| [COM11-D1164] Telekom Australia AG (Q20/11): Proposal for the proceeding by the production of a conformance test suite for Q.2971 | |
| [COM11-D1165] China (Q13/11): B-ISUP signalling for supporting IP | |
| [COM11-D1165R] China (Q13/11, SoI): B-ISUP signalling for supporting IP | |
| [COM11-D1166] KPN (Q12/11): Report of discussions in ETSI on the resolution of the CLI related problems | |
| [COM11-D1167] China (Q8/11): Proposal for modification in Q.FIF | |
| [COM11-D1168] United States of America (Q8/11): Updates to access link release in Q.1721 (Q.FIF) | |
| [COM11-D1169] United States of America (Q8/11): Updates to access link setup & terminal paging in Q.1721 (Q.FIF) | |
| [COM11-D1170mp] Telekom Austria AG (Q20/11): Draft Q.29NIT part 2: ATS (MP). Network integration testing B-ISDN -- end-to-end test specification | |
| [COM11-D1170gr] Telekom Austria AG (Q20/11): Draft Q.29NIT part 2: ATS (GR). Network integration testing B-ISDN -- end-to-end test specification | |
| [COM11-D1171] Telekom Austria AG (Q20/11): Draft Q.29NIT part 1: TSS&TP; network integration testing B-ISDN -- end-to-end test specification | |
| [COM11-D1172] Telekom Australia AG (Q20/11): Draft Q.29NIT part 2: ICS&IXIT network integration testing B-ISDN -- end-to-end test specification | |
| [COM11-D1173] United States of America (Q5/11, Q12/11, Q22/11): Network test call with travelling LOG | |
| [COM11-D1173COR] United States of America (Q5/11, 12/11, 22/11): Network test call with travelling Log | |
| [COM11-D1174] United States of America (Q16/11, Q25/11): Assignment of new nature of address indicators (NAI) for SCCP support of number portability | |
| [COM11-D1175] United States of America (Q11/11, SoI): ISDN aspects of Internet interworking | |
| [COM11-D1176] United States of america (Q5/11, Q22/11, SoI): IN call modelling support for voice over packet in CS-4 | |
| [COM11-D1177] Nortel Network (USA), SBC Technology Ressources Inc., Lucent Technologies (USA), (all questions): ATM trunking for the PSTN/ISDN | |
| [COM11-D1178] United States of America (Q23/11, JQG1/11): Refinement of "functions below LAC" in appendix II of Q.1731.2 (Q.FSR-L2) | |
| [COM11-D1179] United States of America (Q23/11, JQG1/11): Further steps toward the completion of Q.1731.2 (Q.FSR-L2) | |
| [COM11-D1180] United States of America (Q23/11, JQG1/11): Service of layer 2 | |
| [COM11-D1181] United States of America (Q23/11, JQG1/11): Redefinition of IDLE frame function in Q.1731.2 (Q.FSR-L2) | |
| [COM11-D1182] United States of America (Q13/11, JQG1/11): Definition of logical channels in Q.1731.2 (Q.FSR-L2) | |
| [COM11-D1183] United States of America (Q23/11, JQG1/11): Re-organization of section 5 of Q.1731.2 (Q.FSR-L2) | |
| [COM11-D1184] United States of America (Q23/11, JQG1/11): Re-organization of section 6 of Q.1731.2 (Q.FSR-L2) | |
| [COM11-D1185] United States of America (Q23/11, JQG1/11): Definition of user plane primitives in Q.1731.2 (Q.FSR-L2) | |
| [COM11-D1186] Lucent Technologies (Netherlands), (Q8/11, Q24/11): Detailled IMT-2000 NNI signalling requirements for VHE scenario: direct home command ,case: AMG invoked services | |
| [COM11-D1187] Lucent Technologies (Netherlands), (Q8/11, Q24/11): Detailled IMT-2000 NNI signalling requirements for VHE scenario: direct home command, case: LMF invoked services | |
| [COM11-D1188] Lucent Technologies (Netherlands), (Q8/11, Q24/11): Detailed IMT-2000 NNI signaling requirements for VHE scenario: direct home command, case: call-related services | |
| [COM11-D1189] VIAG Interkom GMBH & Co. (Q11/11, Q12/11, Q13/11, Q20/11): Use of the GAT protocol as a means to transport mobility management protocols for IMT-2000 | |
| [COM11-D1190] United Kingdom (Q16/11): Segregation of SCCP NAI values | |
| [COM11-D1191] United Kingdom (Q16/11, Q25/11): Progressing the work on non-circuit related signalling functionality and number portability | |
| [COM11-D1192] United States of America (Q13/11): Proposed changes to draft Recommendation Q.2660, edition 2 | |
| [COM11-D1193] United States of America (Q13/11): Proposed B-ISUP procedures for AESA for calling party for inclusion in Q.2730 | |
| [COM11-D1194] France (Q12/11): Carrier selection information | |
| [COM11-D1195r] LM Ericsson (Q12/11): ATS (Abstract Test Suite) for the draft Q.785.2 | |
| [COM11-D1196] United States of America (Q12/11): Comments on the TC-relay function | |
| [COM11-D1197] United States of America (Q11/11, Q12/11): Mapping of transit network selection | |
| [COM11-D1198] United States of America (Q12/11): Additional requirements on the geodetic location parameter | |
| [COM11-D1199] United States of America (Q12/11): Open issues in TC relay | |
| [COM11-D1200] United States of America (Q11/11): Proposed implementor's guide for Q.952 (call diversion) | |
| [COM11-D1201] United States of America (Q11/11): Proposed implementor's guide for Q.954 (conference calling) | |
| [COM11-D1202] GPT Limited (Marconi Communications Limited) (Q25/11): Editorial corrections to Scope and Number Portability Capability Set 2 Architecture | |
| [COM11-D1203] GPT Limited (Marconi Communications Limited) (Q25/11): Inconsistency of signalling requirements for Number Portability CS2 | |
| [COM11-D1204R] Lucent Technologies (Q5/11, Q8/11, 22/11): Use of triggers for IN services based on mobility management | |
| [COM11-D1205] Hitachi Ltd. (Q20/11): Proposed amendments to Q.2941.2 | |
| [COM11-D1206] Hungarian Telecommunications Company LIM. (Q20/11): Changes in the ETSI DSS2 point-to-multipoint network side ATS | |
| [COM11-D1207] Hungarian Telecommunications Company LIM. (Q20/11): DSS 2 point-to-multipoint network side ATS | |
| [COM11-D1208] VIAG Interkom GmbH & Co (Q11/11): Proposed Q.932 structure and definitions | |
| [COM11-D1209] Nortel Networks (Europe), (Q22/11, Q5/11): CS3 EDP Implicit Disarming rules | |
| [COM11-D1210] United States of America (Q5/11, Q22/11): Proposed clarifications to IN CS-3 Recommendations | |
| [COM11-D1211] Alcatel (Q22/11): IN CS3 Multiple Point of Control (MPC) and (SPC): The rules.. | |
| [COM11-D1212] Alcatel (Q5/11, Q22/11): Call party handling: CS transitions reported to the SCF | |
| [COM11-D1213] Alcatel (Q5/11, Q22/11): Call party handling: Specific case of Splitleg operation | |
| [COM11-D1214] Alcatel (Q22/11): Call party handling: Splitleg pre-condition | |
| [COM11-D1215] BT (Q4/11, Q5/11, Q1/11, Q22/11): New IN 5 plane conceptual model | |
| [COM11-D1216] BT (Q5/11, Q1/11, Q4/11, Q22/11): New service modelling techniques for IN CS4 | |
| [COM11-D1217] BT (Q4/11, Q5/11, Q1/11, Q22/11): Modifications to ITU-T Recommendation Q.65 | |
| [COM11-D1218] BT (Q4/11, Q5/11, Q1/11, Q22/11): New IN unified functional model | |
| [COM11-D1219] Siemens ATEA Belgium (Q10/11, Q16/11, Q12/11 Q22/11, Q25/11): TCAP transactions relay for non-circuit related signalling | |
| [COM11-D1220] United States of America (Q5/11, Q15/11, Q16/11, Q21/11, Q22/11, SoI): Transport of signalling system No.7 over IP | |
| [COM11-D1221] Canada (Q6/11, Q12/11, Q13/11, Q20/11): ATM trunking concept and proposed work plan | |
| [COM11-D1222] Canada (Q12/11, Q16/11, Q25/11): Nature of address assignmnents in support of number portability | |
| [COM11-D1223] Robert Bosch GMBH (Q20/11, Q13/11): Multiconnection Recommendations (Q.298X series) | |
| [COM11-D1224] United States of America (Q12/11): Preferred language indicator for ISUP | |
| [COM11-D1225] Canada (Q11/11): Clarifications to Recommendation Q.933 definitions | |
| [COM11-D1226] Canada (Q11/11): Reservation of DSS1 code points to Recommendations X.36 and X.76 | |
| [COM11-D1227] United States of America (Q5/11, Q22/11): Traffic management with in | |
| [COM11-D1228] United States of America (Q22/11, Q5/11): Preferred language indicator for INAP | |
| [COM11-D1229] Canada (Q8/11): Q.1701: Deletion of obsolete appendix prior to resolution 1 approval | |
| [COM11-D1230] OKI Electric Industry Co., Ltd. (Q20/11): Clarification on draft Recommendation Q.2965.1 (support of QOS classes) | |
| [COM11-D1231] KPN (Q11/11, Q12/11): Generic concept for an end-to-end data transfer capability using the GAT protocol with SS7 TC based support | |
| [COM11-D1232] Nokia (Q23/11): Comments to itu-t Recommendation Q.1741 (formerly Q.FSU) version 3.1 and Q.FIF version 13.0 | |
| [COM11-D1233] France Telecom (Q7/11): UPT feature interactions | |
| [COM11-D1234] France Telecom (Q7/11): Support of UPT by IMT-2000 networks | |
| [COM11-D1235] United States of America (Q8/11): Proposed IMT-2000 3G information flows | |
| [COM11-D1236] Telekom Austria AG (Q12/11): Q.699 ATS (PS format - only in electronic format available) | |
| [COM11-D1237] Telekom Austria AG (Q12/11): Q.699 ATS (MP format - only in electronic format available) | |
| [COM11-D1238] Telekom Austria AG (Q12/11): Q.699 TSS & TP | |
| [COM11-D1239] L.M. Ericsson (Q13/11, Q20/11): Aligning the cause values used in Q.AAL2 with Q.2610 with Q.2610 based on the agreement made in Bern | |
| [COM11-D1240] L.M. Ericsson (Q13/11, Q20/11): Modifications to the GIT Recommendation to support identification of Q.AAL2 users | |
| [COM11-D1241] L.M.Ericsson (Q13/11, Q20/11): Editorial changes to draft Q.AAL2 Recommendation | |
| [CON11-D1242] France Telecom (Q8/11, Q24/11, Q5/11, Q22/11, JRG3 & JRG4): LMF / SCF protocol for mobility management | |
| [COM11-D1243] Siemens AG (Q20/11, Q13/11): Support of extentions to Q.2931 in B-ISUP (Q.2931 living list) | |
| [COM11-D1244] Siemens AG (Q20/11): Changes to support AESA in Q.2931 living list | |
| [COM11-D1245] Siemens (Q20/11, Q13/11): Support of AESA for DSS2 supplementary services | |
| [COM11-D1246] United States of America (Q15/11): Alignment of SDL with text in Q.2140 | |
| [COM11-D1247] United States of America (Q16/11): XUDT deployment strategy | |
| [COM11-D1248] Russia (Q2/11): Proposed extention of annex D Q.751.1 | |
| [COM11-D1249] Canada (Q14/11): Issue with timer T200 of Recommendation Q.922 | |
| [COM11-D1250] Intelsat (Q15/11): Multilink layer 2 protocols and SSCOP | |
| [COM11-D1251] Intelsat (Q15/11): Transmitter considerations for multilink SSCOP | |
| [COM11-D1252] Intelsat (Q15/11): Receiver considerations for multilink SSCOP | |
| [COM11-D1253] Intelsat (Q15/11): SDL fragments for a multilink SSCOP receiver | |
| [COM11-D1254] NTT Docomo (Q6/11 & JQG5): Proposed requirements for AAL type 2 call control protocol | |
| [COM11-D1255] LM Ericsson (Q6/11, Q12/11, Q13/11): Proposed new study item - transport technology independent call control for narrow-band ISDN services in public networks | |
| [COM11-D1256] VIAG Interkom GMBH & Co. (Q11/11, Q12/11, Q13/11, Q22/11): Transport mechanisms for the support of the gat protocol: point-to-multipoint access configurations | |
| [COM11-D1257] VIAG Interkom GMBH &Co. (Q11/11, Q12/11, Q13/11, Q20/11): Comments on the proposal to use a PSS1-like generic functional protocol as a transport mechanism for the GAT protocol | |
| [COM11-D1258] France Télécom (Q7/11, Q8/11, Q22/11, Q24/11): Use of detection points for in services based on mobility events | |
| [COM11-D1259] France Télécom (Q5/22, Q22/11, Q24/11): Design of a common NNI protocol for the mobility management | |
| [COM11-D1260] France Télécom (Q5/11, Q22/11, Q24/11): Discussion on LMF and AMF state models | |
| [COM11-D1261] France Télécom (Q8/11, Q24/11): Information flows for location registration in IMT-2000 networks | |
| [COM11-D1262R] NTT (all questions): Scope of IP telephony in SG11 | |
| [COM11-D1263] NTT (Q2/11, Q22/11): Parameter mapping of location number in portability user origination | |
| [COM11-D1263COR] NTT (Q2/11, Q22/11): Parameter mapping of location number in portability user origination | |
| [COM11-D1264] Telecom Engineering centre - Departement of Telecommunications India (Q25/11): Network and database failure aspects of number portability | |
| [COM11-D1265] Swisscom (Q13/11, Q20/11): Resource collision (non CID) | |
| [COM11-D1266] Swisscom (Q13/11, Q20/11): Diagnostics for compatibility | |
| [COM11-D1267] Siemens AG (Q20/11, Q13/11): Simultaneous call and bearer establishment in draft Q.298X.SCC | |
| [COM11-D1268] Nokia (Q13/11, Q20/11): Revised text for optionality in Q.AAL2 | |
| [COM11-D1269] Nokia (Q13/11, Q20/11): Cause values in Q.aal2 | |
| [COM11-D1270] Nokia (Q13/11, Q20/11): Clarification for Maintenance control in Q.aal2 | |
| [COM11-D1271] Nokia (Q13/11, Q20/11): Clarification of Resource collision in Q.aal2 | |
| [COM11-D1272] Nokia (Q13/11, Q20/11): Comments relating to SDL Diagrams in Q.aal2 | |
| [COM11-D1273] NTT (Q13/11, Q20/11): Comments on the draft Q.aal2 | |
| [COM11-D1274] NEC (Q13/11, Q20/11): Proposed modification of interaction between layer management and protocol procedures | |
| [COM11-D1275] NEC (Q13/11, Q20/11): Proposed revised text for related with layer management and maintenance protocol procedures | |
| [COM11-D1276] Japan Telecom (Q13/11, Q20/11): Proposed revised terminology on "connection or link" and "incoming/outgoing or preceding/succeding" | |
| [COM11-D1277] Japan Telecom (Q13/11, Q20/11): Proposed revised four SDL diagrams | |
| [COM11-D1278] NTT (Q13/11, Q20/11): Proposed addition of the text related to cause value in aal type 2 signalling | |
| [COM11-D1279] United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Qnew): Proposed outline material for study in a new question on VHE (Virtual Home Environment) | |
| [COM11-D1280] Siemens AG (Q13/11): Editorial errors in Q.2723 "CDVT" | |
| [COM11-D1281] United Kingdom (Qnew): New SG11 question to develop signalling requirements for Virtual Home Environment (VHE) | |
| [COM11-D1282] Siemens AG (Q8/11): Error correction / clarification related to the composite functional model in Q.1701 (Q.FIN) | |
| [COM11-D1283] Siemens AG (Q8/11): Clarification of NNI functional communications in Q.1701 | |
| [COM11-D1284] Siemens AG (Q11/11, Q12/11): GAT protocol Q.GFT. Comments on proposed ITU-T draft Q.GFT (TD 54R2 of Bath). Addressing capabilities | |
| [COM11-D1285] Siemens AG (Q11/11, Q12/11): GAT protocol Q.GFT. Comments on proposed ITU-T draft Q.GFT (TD 54R2 of Bath). Network Facility Extension Element, conflicts with already existing implementations of NFE elements (QSIG/PSS1, VPN) | |
| [COM11-D1286] NTT Corporation (Q22/11): Proposal on INAP enhancement for Number Portability Dropback (IN CS-3) | |
| [COM11-D1287] Federal Republic of Germany (Q11/11, Q12/11, Q13/11, Q20/11): Documentation structure and primitive interface for the GAT protocol, application protocols and transport mechanisms | |
| [COM11-D1288] Federal Republic of Germany (Q11/11, Q12/11, Q13/11, Q20/11): Use of the GAT protocol as a means to transport service control protocols for IMT-2000 | |
| [COM11-D1289] L.M. Ericsson (Q12/11, Q16/11): Proposal for NP and non-circuit related signalling | |
| [COM11-D1290] France Telecom (Q20/11): Comments on Q.2931 Living List | |
| [COM11-D1291] France Telecom (Q20/11): Signalling of individual QoS parameters in DSS2 | |
| [COM11-D1292] Siemens AG (Q13/11, Q20/11): Proposed description of CLIP, CLIR, COLP and COLR for non-native E.164 addresses | |
| [COM11-D1293] Siemens AG (Q13/11): Proposed new procedure: Crankback | |
| [COM11-D1294] Telia (Q12/11, Q25/11) Proposal to assign a new NOA value for international network routing numbers in Q.NP | |
| [COM11-D1295] KDD Corporation (Q9/11): Proposal on protocol for SPNE | |
| [COM11-D1296] KDD Corporation (Q9/11, Q12/11): Proposal on signalling procedures and signalling information for tandem mode operation of Digital Multiplexing Equipment with Low-bit-rate Voice Codec (DME with LVC) | |
| [COM11-D1297] NTT (Q12/11): Comments on Q.730 | |
| [COM11-D1298] L.M. Ericsson (Q9/11): Modified message structure for Q.SPNE protocol | |
| [COM11-D1299] Siemens AG (Q11/11): DSS1 Generic Functional Protocol (Q.932) - Introduction of the ASN.1 definitions according ITU-T Recommendations X.680 and X.880 | |
| [COM11-D1300] British Telecom (Q12/11): Comments and clarifications to the pivot routing procedure in Q.730 | |
| [COM11-D1301] NTT (Q11/11): Proposed draft Recommendation "interworking between generic functional protocol (service specific rose) and enhancement generic functional protocol" | |
| [COM11-D1302] France Telecom (Q12/11): Enhancements of ISUP for the support of the service compatibility checks defined in IN CS2 | |
| [COM11-D1303] France Telecom (Q12/11): Proposal for a first draft of the new Recommendation Q.765.3 describing the transfer of in service compatibility indication over ISUP | |
| [COM11-D1304] France Telecom (Q11/11): Comments on draft "interworking between generic functional protocol (service specific rose) and enhanced generic functional protocol" | |
| [COM11-D1305] Federal Republic of Germany (Q11/11): Clarification of the Q.931 coding of the year in the date/time information element (gregorian calendar) | |
| [COM11-D1306] Federal Republic of Germany (Q12/11): Proposal to provide the enhancement of global virtual network service in case of bearer unrelated connections | |
| [COM11-D1307] Federal Republic of Germany (Q12/11): Comments to pivot/rediction procedure | |
| [COM11-D1308] Federal Republic of Germany (Q12/11): Comments on the liaison response from Q.4/2 'HTR information exchange' | |
| [COM11-D1309] L. M. Ericsson (Q12/11): Comments on geodetic information in Q.762 - Q.764 | |
| [COM11-D1310] L. M. Ericsson (Q12/11): Comments on Q.NP | |
| [COM11-D1311r1] KDD Corporation (Japan), (Q1/11): A list of services proposed for examples of service scenarios | |
| [COM11-D1312r1] Alcatel, LM Ericsson AB (Sweden), (Q22/11): INAP support for number portability (connect/initiate call attempt) | |
| [COM11-D1313] L. M. Ericsson (Q22/11): IN CS-3: B-ISDN addressing | |
| [COM11-D1314] KPN (22/11): Service and call gapping | |
| [COM11-D1315] Siemens AG (Q5/11, 22/11): Discussion on INAP-ISUP interworking requirements in the context of number portability (NP) applications | |
| [COM11-D1316r1] France Telecom (Q5/11, Q22/11): ATM addressing and IN | |
| [COM11-D1317] France Telecom (Q5/11, Q22/11): BCSM enhancement for connection characteristics modification | |
| [COM11-D1318] France Telecom (Q5/11, Q22/11): IN capabilities for H.323 based communications | |
| [COM11-D1318R] France Telecom (Q5/11, 22/11, Sol): IN capabilities for H.323 based communications | |
| [COM11-D1319] Intelsat (Q15/11): Multilink layer 2 protocols and SSCOP | |
| [COM11-D1320] Germany (Q2/11): Content of accounting notification | |
| [COM11-D1321] Germany (Q2/11): Further correction to Q.751.1 | |
| [COM11-D1322] Germany (Q2/11): MRVT extension: Current Route Test | |
| [COM11-D1323] Germany (Q2/11): Object model for combined linkset | |
| [COM11-D1324] Swisscom Ltd., L. M. Ericsson (Q15/11): State transition and SDL diagrams for signalling bearer converter on broadband MTP | |
| [COM11-D1325] Alcatel (Q16/11): Use of SCCP centralised database for translation | |
| [COM11-D1326] Lucent Technologies NL B. V. (Q23/11): UIM functionality and requirements | |
| [COM11-D1327] NTT (Q7/11, Q11/11): Clarification of requirements for multiple terminal address registration feature on DSS1 access | |
| [COM11-D1328] NTT (Q5/11, Q12/11, Q22/11, Q25/11): Proposal for the Recommendation Q.NP annex D (Dropback method) | |
| [COM11-D1329R] NTT (Q16/11): Issues on GTAI format in a GTP message | |
| [COM11-D1330] NTT (Q6/11): Deletion of management provider from business model in TRQ.2001 | |
| [COM11-D1331] NTT (Q6/11): Clarification on terms used in TRQ.2001 | |
| [COM11-D1332] Corporation (Q5/11): Proposal on enhancement for IN interworking with private networks (IN CS-4) | |
| [COM11-D1333] NTT (all questions & SoI): Assignment of the information field and protocol identifier in the Q.2941 generic identifier and Q.2957 user-to-user signalling for the Internet protocol | |
| [COM11-D1334] NTT (all questions & SoI): New code assignment in the user-user information element for the Internet | |
| [COM11-D1335] United Kingdom (Q12/11): Signalling system no.7 support of proposed generic addressing and transport protocol | |
| [COM11-D1336] United kingdom (Q20/11): Test suite structure and test purposes for the user side of ITU-T Recommendation Q.2962 | |
| [COM11-D1337] United Kingdom (Q20/11): Test suite structure and test purposes for the network side of ITU-T Recommendation Q.2962 | |
| [COM11-D1338] United Kingdom (Q12/11, Q25/11): Introduction of a new ISUP parameter "number portability forward information" | |
| [COM11-D1339] United Kingdom (Q20/11): DSS2 conformance testing | |
| [COM11-D1340] United Kingdom (Q6/11): Support of multicast capability in an access network | |
| [COM11-D1341] United Kingdom (Q11/11): Proposed text to Recommendation Q.932 to reference GFT-control and the GAT protocol | |
| [COM11-D1342] United Kingdom (Q12/11): Proposed changes to the baseline text for the introduction of a geodetic location parameter | |
| [COM11-D1343] United Kingdom (Q12/11): Clarification to Q.764 PRI procedure | |
| [COM11-D1344] United Kingdom (QAll/11): Handling and publication of conformance test suites | |
| [COM11-D1345] United Kingdom (QAll/11): Publication of formal descriptions | |
| [COM11-D1346] United Kingdom (Q20/11): Comparison of Q.2971 test suites | |
| [COM11-D1347] United Kingdom (Q20/11): Test suite structure and test purposes for the network side of ITU-T Recommendation Q.2961 Parts 1 to 4 | |
| [COM11-D1348] United Kingdom (Q20/11): Test suite structure and test purposes for the user side of ITU-T Recommendation Q.2961 Parts 1 to 4 | |
| [COM11-D1349] United Kingdom (Q20/11): Protocol implementation conformance statement proforma of ITU-T Recommendation Q.2962 | |
| [COM11-D1350] United Kingdom (Q20/11): Protocol implementation conformance statement proforma of ITU-T Recommendation Q.2963.1 | |
| [COM11-D1351] United Kingdom (Q20/11): Protocol implementation conformance statement proforma of ITU-T Recommendation Q.2961 Parts 1 to 4 | |
| [COM11-D1352] United Kingdom (Q20/11): Protocol implementation conformance statement proforma of ITU-T Recommendation Q.2931 | |
| [COM11-D1353] United Kingdom (Q20/11): Abstract test suite for the network side of ITU-T Recommendation Q.2963.1 (contains documents in Word, PostScript and MP format) | |
| [COM11-D1354] United Kingdom (Q20/11): Abstract test suite for the user side of ITU-T Recommendation Q.2963.1 (contains documents in Word, PostScript and MP format) | |
| [COM11-D1355] United Kingdom (Q20/11): Abstract test suite for the network side of ITU-T Recommendation Q.2962 (contains documents in Word, PostScript and MP format) | |
| [COM11-D1356] United Kingdom (Q20/11): Abstract test suite for the user side of ITU-T Recommendation Q.2962 (contains documents in Word, PostScript and MP format) | |
| [COM11-D1357] United Kingdom (Q20/11): Abstract test suite for the network side of ITU-T Recommendation Q.2931 (contains documents in Word, PostScript and MP format) | |
| [COM11-D1358] United Kingdom (Q20/11): Abstract test suite for the user side of ITU-T Recommendation Q.2931 (contains documents in Word, PostScript and MP format) | |
