|
| List of Delayed Contributions (Meeting: 5-22 May 1998) | |
| [COM11-D651/GEN] Siemens Switzerland LTD (Q16,11, Q9/11): Code point for the new speech processing user part | |
| [COM11-D652/GEN] Siemens Switzerland LTD (Q16/11, Q16SANCs/11, Q9/11): Transmission network elements in the SS No.7 network | |
| [COM11-D653/WP2] Siemens Switzerland LTD (Q9/11): Q.SPNE protocol stack based on ITU-T Recommendation Q.710 | |
| [COM11-D654/WP2] Siemens Switzerland LTD (Q9/11): DCME: Fall back (Recommendation Q.50 section 5.3) | |
| [COM11-D655/WP2] Siemens Switzerland LTD (Q9/11): Proposed text changes to Recommendation Q.50/Annex B | |
| [COM11-D656/WP4] Alcatel (Q22/11): Same tag 2 for two parameters in the MoveCallSegmentsArg | |
| [COM11-D657rGEN] China (Q5/11): An enhanced DFP architecture to support IN/Internet Interworking | |
| [COM11-D658/WP4] LM Ericsson (Q5/11 CS3, Q22/11 INAP): Requirements for support of mobile not reachable condition | |
| [COM11-D659/WP4] LM Ericsson (Q5/11 CS3, Q22/11 INAP): BCSM modelling, new DP O/T_Notreachable | |
| [COM11-D660/WP4] LM Ericsson (Q5/11 CS3, Q22/11 INAP): ITU-CS3: CS-2 operation procedure improvements | |
| [COM11-D661/WP4] LM Ericsson (Q5/11 CS3, Q22/11 INAP): Proposed solution to the "glitch problem" | |
| [COM11-D662/WP4] LM Ericsson (Q5/11 CS3, Q22/11 INAP): Inclusion of USI support in the CUSF FE in Q.1238 | |
| [COM11-D663/PL] Hitachi LTD (Q13/11): Proposed corrections to Q2767.1 (COM11-R 86-E) | |
| [COM11-D664/WP1] Post & Telekom Austria AG / Eurescom (Q20/11-DSS2): Proposed first draft Q.29NIT - Network integration testing B-ISDN -end-to-end test specification | |
| [COM11-D665/WP1] Nortel (Europe) (Q13/11, Q20/11): Proposals for AAL type 2 connection control signalling | |
| [COM11-D666/WP1] Fujitsu laboratories LTD. (Q6/11): Terminology of TR Q.2015.1.01 | |
| [COM11-D667/WP2] The Telecommunications Administration of the Russian Federation (Q21/11): Proposal on the clarification of subclause 4.11 of Recommendation Q86.4 | |
| [COM11-D668/WP2] Siemens AG (Q12/11): Clarification on Q767 | |
| [COM11-D669/WP4] Ericsson LM (Sweden), (Q5/11 CS3, Q22/11 INAP): Q1238 Proposed detailed technical improvements | |
| [COM11-D670/WP4] Ericsson LM (Sweden), (Q5/11 CS3, Q22/11 INAP): Timer controlled release | |
| [COM11-D671/WP4] Ericsson LM (Sweden), (Q5/11 CS3, Q22/11 INAP): Proposed clarifying text for multiple point of control | |
| [COM11-D672/WP4] Alcatel, France Telecom, Ericsson, Siemens (Q5/11, Q22/11): Multiple point of control: New rules are required | |
| [COM11-D673/WP4] Nokia Telecommunications (Finland), (Q5/11): Addition of "service provider access to public networks" to in CS-3 network capabilities | |
| [COM11-D674/PL] L.M. Ericsson (Q12/11): Comments on COM 11-R 76-E (Recommendation Q.765.1) | |
| [COM11-D675/WP5] ICO (Q16/11 SANC): Determination and approval of draft revised recommendation Q708 | |
| [COM11-D676rGEN] BT, Cellnet, Ericsson LM, France Telecom, Lucent Technologies, Mannesmann Mobilfunk GMBH, Nokia, Nortel, Siemens AG, SFR, Tele Danmark, Viag Interkom, Vodafone (Q2/11, Q3/11, Q4/11, Q5/11): Request for allocation of globally standardized subsystem numbers | |
| [COM11-D677/GEN] KPN (Q12/11, Q25/11): Discussion on proposed ISUP procedural enhancements for number portability | |
| [COM11-D678/GEN] KPN (Q12/11, Q25/11): Discussion on proposed naming of the ISUP enhancements for number portability | |
| [COM11-D679/GEN] KPN (Q12/11, Q25/11): Special NoA value for calls to ported number without transfer of routing numbers | |
| [COM11-D680/GEN] KPN (Q12/11, Q16/11, Q25/11): Synergy between ISUP and SCCP on protocol enhancements for number portability | |
| [COM11-D681/GEN] KPN (Q12/11, Q16/11, Q22/11, Q25/11): SCCP routing in a number portability environment and synergy with ISUP routing | |
| [COM11-D682/GEN] KPN (Q12/11, Q22/11): IN CS2 support: mapping between INAP Carrier parameter and ISUP TNS parameter | |
| [COM11-D683/GEN] NTT DoCoMo (Q6/11, Q23/11): Additional requirements on AAL type signalling for mobile to mobile communications in IMT-2000 | |
| [COM11-D684/GEN] Fujitsu Limited (Q6/11, Q23/11): Requirement of simultaneous multiple ALL type 2 connection control | |
| [COM11-D685/GEN] NEC (Q6/11, Q23/11): Requirements on QoS classes for AAL type 2 signalling in IMT-2000 | |
| [COM11-D686/GEN] United Kingdom (Q5/11, Q8/11): VHE scenario evaluation criteria | |
| [COM11-D687/WP1] OKI Electric Industry Co. Ltd. (Q20/11): Proposed alignment in draft Recommendation Q.29qos (support of QoS classes) | |
| [COM11-D688rGEN] Lucent Technologies (Q8/11, Q24/11): Scenarios for internet interworking | |
| [COM11-D689/WP3] United Kingdom (Q8/11): Review of Q.fin | |
| [COM11-D690/WP3] United Kingdom (Q8/11 IMT-2000): Additional descriptions for the IMT-2000 composite functional interface model | |
| [COM11-D691/WP3] United Kingdom (Q8/11): Changes to Q.FIN supporting text for figure 5: Support of composite functional interface model | |
| [COM11-D692/WP3] GPT Limited (Q8/11 Q.FIN & Q.FIF): Text for input to a numbering requirements liaison to SG2 | |
| [COM11-D693/WP3] KDD (Q8/11 Q.FIN): Proposed modifications to table 1 of Q.FIN Ver3.1 | |
| [COM11-D694/WP3] NEC (Q8/11 Q.FNA): Proposed modification of functions related to overall system access control | |
| [COM11-D695/WP3] Hitachi (Q8/11): Proposed modification of function description for location data management in Q.FNA section 5.5.2 | |
| [COM11-D696/WP3] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT), Japan (Q8/11 Q.FNA): Proposed modification to the text related to IMT-2000 personal mobility in Q.FNA. | |
| [COM11-D697/WP3] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT), Japan (Q8/11 Q.FNA): Proposed modification to section 5.9 "Functions related to global roaming" in Q.FNA. | |
| [COM11-D698/WP3] KDD (Q8/11 Q.FNA): Proposed modifications to security related functions | |
| [COM11-D699/WP3] NTT DoCoMo (Q8/11 Q.FNA): Proposed elimination of "layer"concept from IMT-2000 functional model | |
| [COM11-D700/WP3] NTT DoCoMo (Q8/11 Q.FNA): Proposed detection of editor's notes on IMT-2000 functional model | |
| [COM11-D701/WP3] Japan Telecom (Q8/11): Comments on Q.FNA section 7.3 "Mapping of IMT-2000 onto network scenarios" | |
| [COM11-D702/WP3] Japan (Q8/11): Proposed modification to network interconnection modeli | |
| [COM11-D703/WP3] NTC (Q8/11 Q.FNA): Proposal to open issue regarding Q.FNA section 8.2.2.1 | |
| [COM11-D704/WP2] NTT DoCoMo (Q8/11 Q.FNA): Proposed delection of section 8.4.1.1 of Q.FNA | |
| [COM11-D705/WP3] NTC, NTT DoCoMo (Q8/11 Q.FNA): Evaluation results of VHE scenarios | |
| [COM11-D706/WP3] Fujitsu Ltd (Q23/11 Q.FSR): Proposed scope of Q.FSR-L2 | |
| [COM11-D707/WP3] Fujitsu, Japan Telecom, Matsushita (Q23/11 Q.FSR): Proposed delection of CRC error detection and handling function | |
| [COM11-D708/WP3] Fujitsu, NTT DoCoMo, OKI (Q23/11 Q.FSR): Proposed modification of the SAP definition | |
| [COM11-D709/WP3] Fujitsi, NTT, DoCoMo, Matsushita Electric Ind. Co., Ltd (Q23/11 Q.FSR): Proposal of relationships between LAC sub-layer and other layers | |
| [COM11-D710/WP3] Fujitsu Ltd (Q23/11 Q.FSR): Proposed modification of primitives between LAC sub-layer and layer3 | |
| [COM11-D711/PL] UK (Q12/11): Q.765 - Minor amendments and clarifications | |
| [COM11-D712/PL] UK (Q12/11): Q.699.1 - Minor amendments and clarifications | |
| [COM11-D713/PL] UK (Q12/11): Q.765.1 - Minor amendments and clarifications | |
| [COM11-D714/GEN] Proposed USA position (Q12/11, Q25/11): Number portability status indicator | |
| [COM11-D715/WP1] United States of America (Q6/11, Q20/11): Modify for AAL2 connections | |
| [COM11-D716/WP3] Lucent Technologies (Q23/11): Proposed communication streams that are carried on an AAL 2 Connection | |
| [COM11-D717/WP2] KPN (Q12/11 N-ISUP, Q9/11 Echo logic): Implementors' guides for Q.732.2-5 (Call Diversion), Q.732.7 (ECT), Q.734.1 (CONF) and Q.734.2 (3 PTY) on echo control related | |
| [COM11-D718/WP2] The Telecommunications Administration of the Russia Federation (Q21/11): Proposal on the clarification of subclause 4.11 of Recommendation Q.86.4 | |
| [COM11-D719/WP2] Siemens AG (Q12/11): Proposal to provide functionalities for the enhancement of global virtual network service | |
| [COM11-D720/WP2] VIAG Interkom GmbH &Co. (Q11/11, Q12/11): Provision of in based services to terminals supporting the generic keypad protocol | |
| [COM11-D721/WP2] United states of America (Q9/11): Proposed revisions Recommendation Q.115 on echo control devices inserted reversed | |
| [COM11-D722/WP2] United States of America (Q9/11): Proposed revisions to per call control signalling section in Recommendation Q.spne | |
| [COM11-D723/WP2] United States of America (Q12/11): Preferred language indicator | |
| [COM11-D724/WP2] Nortel Plc. (Q12/11): Application of CLI information in specific scenarrios | |
| [COM11-D725/WP1] Swisscom (Q6/11): Application of ITU-T Recommendation A.3 to TRQ.2015.1.01 | |
| [COM11-D726/WP1] Swisscom (Q6/11): Style of the Call Control Functional Entity Actions | |
| [COM11-D727/WP1] Swisscom (Q13/11, Q20/11 AAL2): Structure and primitives for the AAL type 2 signalling | |
| [COM11-D728/WP1] Swisscom (Q13/11, Q20/11 AAL2): Protocol data units for AAL type 2 signalling | |
| [COM11-D729/WP1] Swisscom (Q13/11, Q20/11 AAL2): State transitions for the AAL type 2 signalling | |
| [COM11-D730/WP1] Swisscom (Q13/11, Q20/11 AAL2): Information flows in the AAL type 2 signalling | |
| [COM11-D731/PL] Federal Republic of Germany (Q13/11): Editorial comments on Q.2767.1 "Soft PVC Capability" | |
| [COM11-D732/PL] Federal Republic of Germany (Q13/11): Minor comments to Recommendation Q.2767.1 (Soft PVC) | |
| [COM11-D733/PL] Federal Republic of Germany (Q11/11): Q.932 Procedures for the networked connection oriented call independent component transport mechanism | |
| [COM11-D734/PL] Federal Republic of Germany (Q11/11): Q.932 Applicability of the networked connection oriented call independent component transport mechanism | |
| [COM11-D735/GEN] Federal Republic of Germany (Q13/11, Q12/11): Proposed draft edition 2 of Recommendation Q.2660 | |
| [COM11-D736/GEN] United Kingdom (Q16/11, Q2/11): Treatment of SSP for SCMG (SSN=1) | |
| [COM11-D737/GEN] United Kingdom (Q16/11, Q25/11): Considerations on SCCP and Number Portability | |
| [COM11-D738/GEN] Alcatel (Q5/11, Q6/11, Q22/11): Scope of IN CS3 and IN CS4 in order to support B-ISDN | |
| [COM11-D739/GEN] Alcatel (Q25/11): Number Portability | |
| [COM11-D740/GEN] United States of America (Q8/11, Q24/11, Q5/11): Alternate mapping of IMT-2000 Model into IN CS-2 Architecture | |
| [COM11-D741/WP1] Siemens AG (Q13/11): Initial set of B-ISUP procedures for network LIJ | |
| [COM11-D742/WP1] Alcatel (Q6/11, Q13/11, Q20/11): AAL Type 2 Signalling protocol | |
| [COM11-D743/WP1] Alcatel (Q13/11, Q20/11): Assignment procedures | |
| [COM11-D744/WP1] Federal Repubilic of Germany (Q13/11): Description of the modified B-ISUP assignment procedures [Re-issue of contribution to SG 11 September '97 meeting] | |
| [COM11-D745/WP1] Federal Republic of Germany (Q13/11): CDVT indication and modified assignment procedures | |
| [COM11-D746/WP1] Federal Republic of Germany (Q13/11): Proposed corrections of errors and editorial enhancements in B-ISUP CS1 Recommendations | |
| [COM11-D747/WP1] Federal Republic of Germany (Q13/11): Answers to the questions on the occurence of "VP Selection mismatch" | |
| [COM11-D748/WP1] Federal Republic of Germany (Q13/11, Q20/11): Description of TNS parameter mapping | |
| [COM11-D749/WP1] Kokusai Denshin Denwa Co. (Q13/11): The N-ISUP(97) parameters for the study of the specification B-ISUP/N-ISUP interworking | |
| [COM11-D750/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): Proposals for Q.FIN regarding Packet Data Capabilities for IMT-2000 CS-1 | |
| [COM11-D751/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): Proposed changes to Q.FNA to Integrate Circuit Mode and Packet Mode operations | |
| [COM11-D752/WP3] Nortel (Canada) (Q8/11): Q.FIN, A perspective on advancing IMT-2000 Network Capabilities | |
| [COM11-D753/WP3] Nortel (Canada) (Q8/11): Q.FIN and Q.FNA, Interaction between Authentication Control and Service Control functionality | |
| [COM11-D754/WP3] Nortel (Canada) (Q8/11): Definitions for "Service Capability" and "Network Capability" | |
| [COM11-D755/WP3] Nortel (Canada) (Q8/11): Q.FIN, Improvements to definition of IMT-2000 family member | |
| [COM11-D756/WP3] Qualcomm Inc., Motorola, Lucent Technologies (Q23/11): Layer-2 services provided to layer-3 in draft Recommendation Q.FSR Layer-2 | |
| [COM11-D757/WP3] Qualcomm Inc., Motorola, Lucent Technologies (Q23/11): Revised text for LAC functions in the draft Recommendation Q.FSR Layer-2 | |
| [COM11-D758/WP3] Qualcomm Inc., Motorola, Lucent Technologies (Q23/11): Architecture of the LAC sub-layer | |
| [COM11-D759/WP3] United States of America (Q23/11): Definition of the scope of Layer-2 in the draft Recommendation Q.FSR | |
| [COM11-D760/WP3] United States of America (Q24/11): NNI requirements | |
| [COM11-D761WP3] United States of America (Q24/11): Comments on Q.FSN v1.0 | |
| [COM11-D762/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11, Q23/11): ITU-T work on IMT-2000 RAN-CN interface | |
| [COM11-D763/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11, Q23/11): ITU-T work to move forward on development of IMT-2000 IUM-MT interface specs. for CS-1 | |
| [COM11-D764/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): Proposed mofications to section 5.12 of Q.FNA | |
| [COM11-D765/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): Proposed modifications to Section 5.8 of Q.FNA | |
| [COM11-D766/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): Proposed modifications to Section 5.5.2 of Q.FNA | |
| [COM11-D767/WP3] United States of America (Q23/11): Example of protocol specification for an IMT-2000 system | |
| [COM11-D768/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): Proposed modifications to Section 5.6.1 of Q.FNA | |
| [COM11-D769/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): Proposed modifications to Section 5.9 of Q.FNA | |
| [COM11-D770/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): Proposed evaluation criteria | |
| [COM11-D771WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): Comments on Q.FIN v3.1 - Section 5 Introduction | |
| [COM11-D772/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): Comments on Q.FIN v3.1 - Section 3 Definitions | |
| [COM11-D773/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): Comments on Q.FIN v3.1 - Section 6 Familiy Concept | |
| [COM11-D774/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): Comments on Q.FIN v3.1 - Section 7 Table/Q.FIN | |
| [COM11-D775/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): Comments on Q.FIN v3.1 - Section 8 Interfaces for Study | |
| [COM11-D776/WP3] Lucent Technologies Netherlands (Q8/11, Q24/11): VHE Scenario Selection | |
| [COM11-D777/WP3] Lucent Technologies Netherlands (Q24/11): Draft Recommendation Q.FSN | |
| [COM11-D778/WP3] Lucent Technologies Netherlands (Q8/11): "Supporting Network" to replace "Service Provider Network" | |
| [COM11-D779/WP3] Lucent Technologies Netherlands (Q24/11): IMT2000 Global Roaming Environment | |
| [COM11-D780/WP3] United States of America (Q23/11): An addition to Q.FSA requirements for access link protocol | |
| [COM11-D781/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): Discussion on the Information Flow Model | |
| [COM11-D782/WP3] Lucent Technologies USA (Q23/11): Proposed communication streams that are carried on a AAL2 Connection | |
| [COM11-D783/WP3] Lucent Technologies Netherlands (Q8/11): In support of the Family of Systems | |
| [COM11-D784/WP3] Lucent Technologies Netherlands (Q24/11): IMT2000 NNI Communication grouping | |
| [COM11-D785/WP3] France Telecom (Q7/11): Model for distributed service profile | |
| [COM11-D786/WP3] France Telecom (Q7/11): Remote registration for UPT and remote service profile transfer | |
| [COM11-D787/WP3] France Telecom (Q7/11): Interactions between UPT features and ISDN/PLMN services | |
| [COM11-D788/WP3] France Telecom (Q7/11): Secure answering based on call related and call unrelated procedures | |
| [COM11-D789/WP3] France Telecom (Q7/11): Management of UPT indicators | |
| [COM11-D790/WP3] Siemens AG (Q8/11): Refinement of Table 1/Q.FIN | |
| [COM11-D791/WP3] Siemens AG (Q8/11): Clarification and enhancement of the minimum charging and accounting capabilities of IMT-2000 CS1 | |
| [COM11-D792/WP3] Siemens AG (Q8/11): Prioritisation of the VHE scenarios in IMT-2000 capability set 1 | |
| [COM11-D793/WP3] Siemens AG (Q8/11): Proposed revision of global roaming section (IMT-2000 network interconnection model) | |
| [COM11-D794/WP3] Siemens AG (Q8/11): Network interconnection scenarios related to the interaction between UIMF and home network (SCFh, AMFh) | |
| [COM11-D795/WP3] Siemens AG (Q8/11): Identification of options, alternatives and examples inside Q.FNA | |
| [COM11-D796/WP3] Siemens AG (Q8/11): Mobile-to-mobile packet data routing | |
| [COM11-D797/PL] Deutsche Telekom (Q20/11): Comments on Recommendation Q.2963.3 | |
| [COM11-D798/GEN] USA (Q6/11, Q23/11): Proposal to initiate AAL type 2 edge to edge signalling requirements | |
| [COM11-D799/GEN] Australia (Q13/11, Q9/11): Echo control signalling procedures for B-ISDN | |
| [COM11-D800/GEN] VIAG Interkom GmbH &Co. (Q11/11, Q20/11): GFT-Control protocol: verification of the source entity address | |
| [COM11-D801/WP1] NEC Corporation (Q13/11 B-ISUP): Proposed bearer identifier parameter for the multiconnection call control | |
| [COM11-D802/WP1] NEC Corporation (Q13/11 B-ISUP): Proposed multiconnection call identifier parameter for multiconnection call control | |
| [COM11-D803/WP1] NEC Corporation (Q13/11 B-ISUP): Proposed IDs for multiconnection call control | |
| [COM11-D804/WP1] Tadiran Telecommunications (Q6/11): Update to section 9, entitled "Engineering Views", of TRQ.2001 | |
| [COM11-D805/WP1] Ericsson (Q13/11): Basic call enhancements for routing with AESA format | |
| [COM11-D806/WP1] Ericsson (Q13/11): B-ISUP CS 2.1 overview incorporation into Q.2761 | |
| [COM11-D807/WP1] USA (Q6/11): Proposed modifications to information model for the service support | |
| [COM11-D808/WP1] Nokia (Q20/11, Q13/11): ASN.1 usage in the AAL type 2 signalling protocol specification | |
| [COM11-D809/PL] L.M. Ericsson (Q12/11): Comments on COM 11-R 76-E (Rec. Q.765.1) | |
| [COM11-D810/PL] France Telecom (Q20/11): Proposed modifications to draft Rec. Q.2934 ("Switched Virtual Path") | |
| [COM11-D811/PL] L.M. Ericsson (Q. New): Proposed new SG11 question - Operation of public telecommunications services over an IP network | |
| [COM11-D812/GEN] France Telecom (Q20/11): Proposal to consider the definition of a Bearer Class for IP service in the DSS2 Broadband-Bearer capability information element | |
| [COM11-D813/GEN] France Telecom (Q14/11, all): Proposed definition of a SAPI value (in Q.921) for PPP or MP/IP data in D channel | |
| [COM11-D814/WP1] France Telecom (Q6/11, Q13/11, Q20/11): AAL2 signalling configuration and protocol general principles | |
| [COM11-D815/WP1] France Telecom (Q6/11): AAL2 signalling requirements (draft TRQ2015.1) improvements | |
| [COM11-D816/WP1] France Telecom (Q20/11): Proposed modifications to draft Rec. Q.29qos | |
| [COM11-D817/WP3] France Telecom (Q8/11): Clarifications on the IMT2000 bearer capabilities mentioned in Q.FIN | |
| [COM11-D818/WP3] France (Q8/11): Specifications of the IMT-2000 radio interface in ITU-R TG 8/1 and ITU-T SG11 | |
| [COM11-D819/WP3] France Telecom (Q8/11): Review of Q.FNA: Discussion on the role model interest in Q.FNA | |
| [COM11-D820/WP3] France Telecom (Q8/11): Review of Q.FIN table 1 and comparison between IMT2000 requirements and GSM capabilities | |
| [COM11-D821/WP3] Ericsson LM, Nokia and Siemens AG on behalf of ETSI SMG (Q8/11, 23/11): Comments on the standardization of the MT-RAN interface in Q.FIN | |
| [COM11-D822/WP3] Nokia (Q23/11): Speech bearer services in Q.FSR-GA | |
| [COM11-D823/WP3] Nokia, Ericsson, Siemens (Q23/11, Q8/11): Standardisation of the RAN-CN interface in Q23/11 | |
| [COM11-D824/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): Inter-family Tiered services and hierarchical cell structures | |
| [COM11-D825/WP3] Motorola (USA)(Q8/11): Peer-to-peer L3 signalling for over-the-air interface (Carry over Contribution from Yokosuka Rapporteur's Meeting) | |
| [COM11-D826/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): Revisions to Q.FIN, mainly Table 1/Q.FIN | |
| [COM11-D827/GEN] France Telecom (Q5/11, Q8/11): Impact of screening on the Service Logic Scripts | |
| [COM11-D828/GEN] France Telecom (Q5/11, Q8/11, Q22/11, Q24/11): Mobility management protocol design for a common NNI | |
| [COM11-D829/GEN] France Telecom (Q3/11, Q5/11, Q8/11): Security requirements for mobile services | |
| [COM11-D830/GEN] France Telecom (Q8/11, Q5/11): VHE Scenario Evaluation Criterias | |
| [COM11-D831/GEN] France Telecom (Q8/11, Q5/11, Q22/11): VHE offering on call and user basis | |
| [COM11-D832/GEN] Post and Telekom Austria AG / OeFEG, Austria (Q12/11, Q25/11): Two level addressing for number portability | |
| [COM11-D833/GEN] Post and Telekom Austria AG / OeFEG, Austria (Q25/11, Q12/11): Number Portability - Query on release | |
| [COM11-D834/GEN] Post and Telekom Austria AG / OeFEG, Austria (Q12/11, Q25/11): Number portability - Cause value for query on release | |
| [COM11-D825/GEN] VIAG Interkom GMBH & Co. (Q11/11, Q12/11, Q13/11, Q20/11): Enhanced generic functional protocol: Addressing issues | |
| [COM11-D836/WP1] Nokia (Q6/11, Q20/11, Q13): Proposal of the AAL type 2 connection reference parameter for the AAL type 2 signaling protocol specification | |
| [COM11-D837/WP1] Nokia (Q20/11, Q13/11): Signalling bearers for AAL type 2 signalling protocol | |
| [COM11-D838/WP1] Siemens AG (Q20/11): Inconsistencies in Q.2931 | |
| [COM11-D839/WP1] Siemens AG (Q20/11, Q13/11): Comments on Q.2610 living list and Q.2610 | |
| [COM11-D840r/PL] Siemens AG (Q20/11): Inconsistency in Q.2951 | |
| [COM11-D841/WP1] Siemens AG (Q20/11, Q13/11): Comments on Q.2961.5 (CDVT) | |
| [COM11-D842/WP1] Siemens AG (Q20/11, Q13/11): Q.2931: Procedures for End-to-end transit delay | |
| [COM11-D843/WP1] Siemens AG (Q6/11): Signalling requirements for leaf initiated join - open issues | |
| [COM11-D844/WP1] France Telecom (Q13/11): Enhancement of the VPCI/VCI Assignment Procedure | |
| [COM11-D845/GEN] CSELT (Q12/11, Q25/11): Introduction of a new ISUP parameter "Physical access ID"of the calling user | |
| [COM11-D846/GEN] CSELT (Q12/11, Q25/11): Introduction of a new ISUP parameter "Ported number ID" | |
| [COM11-D847/GEN] CSELT (Q12/11, Q25/11): Procedures to support Number Portability | |
| [COM11-D848/WP3] NTT DoCoMo (Q8/11): Proposal for modification of Q.FNA 5.6.5 | |
| [COM11-D849/WP4] British Telecom (Q5/11, Q22/11): Exploring the use of APIs in IN CS4 | |
| [COM11-D850/WP4] United States of America (Q22/11): IN CS-3, beyond E.164 Adressing | |
| [COM11-D851/WP4] United States of America (Q5/11, Q22/11): IN CS-3, extension to DestinationRoutingAddress parameter | |
| [COM11-D852/WP4] United States of America (Q22/11): IN CS-3, new parameters for InitialDP & Connect in support of broadband | |
| [COM11-D853/WP4] Siemens AG (Q5/11): Scope and completion date of IN CS-3 | |
| [COM11-D854/WP4] Siemens AG (Q5/11, Q22/11): Interworking requirements for the enhanced CUSF-SCF | |
| [COM11-D855rGEN] Siemens AG (Q5/11, 22/11): Support for Internet Benchmark services in IN CS-3/CS-4 | |
| [COM11-D856/WP4] Siemens AG (Q22/11): Clarifications and corrections for the CUSF-SCF interface, IN CS-3, Q.1238 | |
| [COM11-D857/WP4] Siemens AG (Q5/11, Q22/11): Proposed service feature "Security Management" for IN CS3 | |
| [COM11-D858/WP4] LM Ericsson AB Sweden (Q22/11): Implementor's guide for Q.1228 | |
| [COM11-D859/WP4] Kokusai Denshin Denwa Co, Japan (Q1/11): Requirement and overview for Q.xx08 Q.FRWK Examples of service scenarios | |
| [COM11-D860/WP4] Kokusai Denshin Denwa Co, Japan (Q22/11): The descriptions for the user-interaction mechanisms enhancements | |
| [COM11-D861/WP4] United kingdom (Q5/11): Changes to Q.1231 support for high priority service features in table 1: Mobile Call Origination | |
| [COM11-D862/WP4] United Kingdom (Q5/11): Changes to Q.1231 support for high priority network capabilities in table 1.3: Identity confimation | |
| [COM11-D863/WP4] United Kingdom (Q5/11): Changes to Q.1231 support for high priority network capabilities in table 1.3: QoS Negotiation | |
| [COM11-D864/WP4] Japan Telecom (Q5/11, Q22/11): Proposed definition of resumePoint parameter | |
| [COM11-D865/WP4] Swisscom (Q22/11): IN CS3/CS4 & B-ISDN: Call Control View States and Transitions | |
| [COM11-D866/WP4] Swisscom (Q22/11): IN CS3/CS4 & B-ISDN: Bearer Control View States and Transition | |
| [COM11-D867/WP4] Swisscom (Q22/11): IN CS3/CS4 & B-ISDN: Third Party Connection Setup | |
| [COM11-D868/WP4] Swisscom (Q22/11): IN CS3/CS4 & B-ISDN: Initiate Connection Attempt | |
| [COM11-D869/WP4] Swisscom (Q22/11): IN CS3/CS4 & B-ISDN: Call Party Handling | |
| [COM11-D870/WP4] Swisscom (Q22/11): IN CS3/CS4 & B-ISDN: Detection Point Handling | |
| [COM11-D871/WP4] Swisscom (Q22/11): IN CS3/CS4 & B-ISDN: Call Control Segment Association | |
| [COM11-D872/WP4] Cegetel France (Q5/11): Changes to Q.1231support for high priority service feature in table 1: Message Waiting Indication | |
| [COM11-D873/WP4] Ericsson AB Sweden (Q5/11, Q22/11): A proposed way forward with the VHE scenarios | |
| [COM11-D874/WP4] Ericsson AB Sweden (Q5/11, Q22/11): Transport of VHE service control operations in the Transparent Relay scenario | |
| [COM11-D875/WP4] France Telecom (Q3/11, Q22/11): Set of methods for security for mobile and fixed services | |
| [COM11-D876/WP4] France Telecom (Q1/11): Clarification of the notion of RETAILER in a Telecommunication Business Model and its impact on the RET specifications | |
| [COM11-D877/WP4] KPN (Q22/11): Consequences of enabling triggering of services on early determined call failure conditions | |
| [COM11-D878/WP4] KPN (Q5/11): Management requirements on INAP screening profiles | |
| [COM11-D879/WP4] KPN (Q3/11, Q5/11, Q22/11): Text for Q.1238 on INAP screening | |
| [COM11-D880/WP4] KPN (Q22/11): Proposed text for Q.1238 on INAP screening | |
| [COM11-D881/WP4] Ericsson LM Sweden (Q5/11, Q22/11): UI in monitoring state, enhancements for detailed operation procedures | |
| [COM11-D882/WP4] Ericsson LM Sweden (Q5/11, Q22/11): Proposed correction of some technical errors found in Q.1228 | |
| [COM11-D883/WP4] Ericsson LM Sweden (Q5/11, Q22/11): Proposed detailed specification of SCFID | |
| [COM11-D884/WP4] Ericsson LM Sweden (Q5/11, Q22/11): User interaction in monitoring state, enhancement of SCF Application Entity Procedures | |
| [COM11-D885/WP4] KPN (Q22/1): Definition of Carrier parameter for the transfer of the ISUP TNS parameter | |
| [COM11-D886/WP4] France Telecom (Q5/11, Q22/11): Per call basis overriding of line restrictions | |
| [COM11-D887/WP4] France Telecom (22/11): Precisions to TD 53 (New Delhi February 1998) | |
| [COM11-D888/WP4] France Telecom (Q5/11, Q22/11): Enhancement of sendChargingInformation operation with a noCharge parameter | |
| [COM11-D889/WP4] France Telecom (Q5/11, Q22/11): Use of the USIServiceIndicator as a DP criteria | |
| [COM11-D890/WP4] France Telecom (Q22/11): Precisions to TD 67 (New Delhi February 1998) | |
| [COM11-D891/WP4] France Telecom (Q22/11): A genericNumbers parameter in InitialAssociation, ConnectAssociation and InitiateAssociation operations | |
| [COM11-D892/WP4] France Telecom (Q5/11, Q22/11): Multiple point of control | |
| [COM11-D893/WP4] France Telecom (Q22/11): Extensions of the pre-conditions for the SplitLeg procedure | |
| [COM11-D894/WP4] France Telecom (Q22/11): Enhancement of CTR and DFCWA operations with the USI related parameters | |
| [COM11-D895/WP4] France Telecom (Q5/11, Q22/11): Triggering of services on call failure conditions | |
| [COM11-D896/WP4] France Telecom (Q5/11, Q22/11): Introduction of a SSF-SCF FastPlay Announcement operation | |
| [COM11-D897/WP4] France Telecom (Q5/11, Q22/11): Information exchange between service logics | |
| [COM11-D898/WP4] France Telecom (Q5/11, Q22/11): Enhancement of the CS2 O/T-BCSMs | |
| [COM11-D899/WP4] France Telecom (5/11, Q22/11): Enhancement of the forwardServiceInteractionInd sub-parameter of the ServiceInteractionIndicatorsTwo parameter | |
| [COM11-D900/WP4] France Telecom (Q5/11, Q22/11): Multi Point of control: User Intercation Handling | |
| [COM11-D901/WP4] France Telecom (Q22/11): Proposal for the CreateTriggerData operation | |
| [COM11-D902/WP4] France Telecom (Q5/11, Q22/11): Using INAP in an IP environment | |
| [COM11-D903rGEN] France Telecom (Q5/11, Q22/11): Architecture and protocols for internet-related service features | |
| [COM11-D904/WP4] United Kingdom (Q5/11, Q22/11): Completion of IN CS3 | |
| [COM11-D905/WP5] United Kingdom (Q16/11): Global title management | |
| [COM11-D906/WP5] Editor Q.753 (Q2/11): Q.753 MRVT implementor's guide | |
| [COM11-D907/WP5] Editor Q.754 (Q2/11): Q.754 MRVT implementor's guide | |
| [COM11-D908/WP5] United Kingdom (Q16/11): Clarify MTP/SCCP restart procedures | |
| [COM11-D909/WP5] United Kingdom (Q16/11): Proposal to transport SSNs transparently across the international network | |
| [COM11-D910/WP5] United States of America (Q16/11): Application of the SS7 Basic error correction procedure | |
| [COM11-D911/WP5] Federal Republic of Germany (Q2/11): MRVT Extension: Current route test | |
| [COM11-D912/WP5] Alcatel (Q16/11): SCCP Calling Party Address management | |
| [COM11-D913/WP5] Alcatel (Q16/11): SCCP availability check | |
| [COM11-D914/WP5] Alcatel (Q2/11): Comments on MTP managed objects | |
| [COM11-D915/WP5] Alcatel (Q2/11): Comments on MTP managed objects | |
| [COM11-D916/WP5] Alcatel (Q2/11): Comments on SCCP managed objects | |
| [COM11-D917/WP5] Alcatel (Q2/11): Comments on SCCP managed objects | |
| [COM11-D918/WP5] Alcatel (Q2/11): Comments on SCCP managed objects | |
| [COM11-D919/WP5] Alcatel (Q2/11): Comments on SCCP managed objects | |
| [COM11-D920/WP2] Federal Republic of Germany (Q12/11): Value of application context identifier of the application transport mechanism | |
| [COM11-D921rGEN] Federal Republic of Germany (Q12/11): Calling identities | |
| [COM11-D922/WP2] Federal Republic of Germany (Q12/11): Introduction of calling user number | |
| [COM11-D923/WP2] Federal Republic of Germany (Q11/11): Q.932: Transport mechanism extensions for point-to-multipoint access configurations | |
| [COM11-D924/WP2] Coherent Communications Systems Ltd. (Q9/11): Proposed message-based signalling protocol for Q.SPNE | |
| [COM11-D925/WP2] United States of America (Q12/11): ISUP Pivot Routing - Proposed changes | |
| [COM11-D926/WP2] France (Q12/11): ISUP enhancements for number portability with Query on Release | |
| [COM11-D926cWP2] France Telecom (Q12/11): ISUP enhancements for number portability with Query on Release | |
| [COM11-D927/WP2] L.M. Ericsson (Q12/11): Proposal for TC-relay text in Q.730 | |
| [COM11-D928/WP2] L.M. Ericsson (Q12/11): Comments on draft Recommendation Q.761 | |
| [COM11-D929/WP2] Alcatel SEL AG (Q12/11): Support of GFT | |
| [COM11-D930/WP2] LM Ericsson (Q12/11): Abstract Test Suite (ATS) for the draft Q.785.2 | |
| [COM11-D931/WP2] LM Ericsson (Q12/11): Updated draft ITU-T Recommendation Q.785.2 - Abstract test suites for ISUP'97 supplementary services | |
| [COM11-D932/WP2] Post und Telekom Austria AG, Austria (Q12/11): Proposed draft for Q.699TSS&TP | |
| [COM11-D933/WP3] Korea Telecom (Q8/11): Amended proposal on `Non-diversity handover controlled by same RACF' functional model and information flows | |
| [COM11-D934/WP3] Korea Telecom (Q23/11): Proposal on the modification of the overall structure in Q.FSU | |
| [COM11-D935/WP3] Korea Telecom (Q23/11): Proposed addition and modification in Q.FSU | |
| [COM11-D936/WP3] Korea Telecom (Q8/11): Propose the Multi handover control function related to handover in the section 5.4 of Q.FNA | |
| [COM11-D937/WP4] Korea Telecom (Q5/11): Proposed functional model for IN CS-3.1 considering integration of mobility, Internet, and IN | |
| [COM11-D938/PL] France Telecom (Q12/11): Q.699.1 - Editorial corrections | |
| [COM11-D939/PL] GPT Limited (Q11/11, Q12/11): Cause values used for Closed user group | |
| [COM11-D940/PL] GPT Limited (Q11/11, Q12/11): Cause values used for multilevel precedence and premption | |
| [COM11-D941/WP3] Ericsson L M (Q8/11): Review Q.FIN | |
| [COM11-D942rGEN] Ericsson LM (Q8/11, Q23/11, Q24/11): IMT-2000 protocols specifications | |
| [COM11-D943/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): Modifications to VHE description in Q.FNA section 8.2.2.6 | |
| [COM11-D944/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): Modifications to Q.FNA section 6.4 to clarify authentication and encryption functions | |
| [COM11-D945/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): Modifications to Q.FNA section 6.3 to clarify authentification and encryption functions | |
| [COM11-D946/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): Resolution of SMS issue | |
| [COM11-D947/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): SRF access with separated call and connection control | |
| [COM11-D948/WP3] Ericsson LM (Q8/11): Separation of Circuit Switched and Packet Switched networks | |
| [COM11-D949/WP3] Ericsson LM Sweden (Q8/11): Broadband capabilities within IMT-2000 CS-1 | |
| [COM11-D950/WP3] Ericsson LM Sweden (Q23/11): Modification to Q.FSR-GA regarding the Layer 2: Frame Prioritization | |
| [COM11-D951rWP3] Ericsson LM Sweden (Q23/11): Modification to Q.FSR-GA and Q.FSR-L2: Idle Frames | |
| [COM11-D952/WP3] Ericsson LM, Nokia and Siemens AG (Q8/11, Q23/11): Comments on the standardization of the MT-RAN interface in Q.FIN | |
| [COM11-D953/WP3] Ericsson LM Sweden (Q8/11): Open issues in the Q.FNA | |
| [COM11-D954/WP3] Ericsson LM Sweden (Q23/11): Modification to Q.FSR-L2: Quick repeat & duplicate detection | |
| [COM11-D955/WP3] Ericsson LM Sweden (Q8/11): VHE scenarios | |
| [COM11-D956/WP3] Ericsson LM Sweden (Q23/11): Modification to Q.FSR-GA and Q.FSR-L2: Out of sequence delivery | |
| [COM11-D957/WP3] Ericsson LM Sweden (Q8/11): Software configurable teminals | |
| [COM11-D958/WP1] Nokia (Q20/11, Q13/11): Methods to resolve channel ID collision for the AAL type 2 signalling protocol specification | |
| [COM11-D959/WP1] NTT (Q20/11, Q13/11): Required signalling protocol functions for AAL type 2 | |
| [COM11-D960/WP1] Ericsson, Sweden (Q13/11, Q20/11): Establishment and clearing of AAL type 2 connections | |
| [COM11-D961/WP1] L.M. Ericsson (Q13/11, Q20/11): Roadmap of AAL type 2 protocol development contributions | |
| [COM11-D962/WP1] L.M. Ericsson (Q6/11, Q13/11, Q20/11): Proposed new SG11 question - Signalling to control AAL type 2 connections | |
| [COM11-D963/WP1] Ericsson (Q13/11, Q20/11): AAL2 state alignment (reset) procedure | |
| [COM11-D964/WP1] L.M. Ericsson (Q6/11): Clarification to AAL type 2 signalling requirement 3.10 | |
| [COM11-D965/WP1] Ericsson, Sweden (Q6/11): AAL2 CPS-PP maximum size in the AAL2 signalling protocol | |
| [COM11-D966/WP1] Ericsson, Sweden (Q13/11, Q20/11): AAL2 link indentifier | |
| [COM11-D967/WP1] L.M. Ericsson (Q13/11, Q20/11): A forward compatibility mechanism for the AAL type 2 signalling protocol | |
| [COM11-D968/WP1] Ericsson (Q13/11, Q20/11): AAL2 CID and bearer contention handling | |
| [COM11-D969/WP1] L.M. Ericsson (Q13/11, Q20/11): Backward compatibility rules for the AAL type 2 signalling protocol | |
| [COM11-D970/WP1] Ericsson (Q13/11, Q20/11): Mechanism for enabling AAL type 2 user applications to be identified | |
| [COM11-D971/WP1] L.M. Ericsson (Q13/11, Q20/11): Addressing in AAL2 networks | |
| [COM11-D972/WP1] L.M.Ericsson (Q13/11, Q20/11): Addressing of AAL2 nodes in a switched ATM network | |
| [COM11-D973/WP1] Ericsson, Sweden (Q13/11, Q20/11): Making the AAL2 signalling protocol independent of underlying signalling bearer | |
| [COM11-D974/WP3] United States of America (Q8/11): Resolution of mobility management in service access | |
| [COM11-D975/WP3] Ericsson LM Sweden (Q8/11): Information flows of missing 2nd generation capabilities | |
| [COM11-D976/WP3] Ericsson LM Sweden (Q8/11): Proposed modifications to Q.FIN and Q.FNA for mobility management related IN service triggering | |
| [COM11-D977rWP2] United States of America (Q12/11): Terminating an offer to Pivot or indicating receipt of an offer to Pivot | |
| [COM11-D978rWP2] Bellcore (Q12/11): Returning a call to the invoking exchange | |
| [COM11-D979/PL] United States of America (Q13/11): Comments on draft new ITU-T Recommendation Q.2766.1, Switched Virtual Path | |
| [COM11-D980/PL] United States of America (Q13/11): Comments on draft new ITU-T Recommendation Q.2767.1, Soft PVC | |
| [COM11-D981/GEN] Telecom India (Q25/11): Network efficiency aspects for number portability service | |
| [COM11-D982/GEN] Telecom India (Q25/11): Number portability in PLMN | |
| [COM11-D983/GEN] United States of America (Qall/11(Sol), Q13/11(B-ISUP): Scope within B-ISUP for support of internet | |
| [COM11-D984rWP1] Telecom India (13/11, Q20/11, Q6/11): 1) Network signalling for support of broadband services 2) Unified functional model for signalling 3) Signalling interworking with upper layers (electronically not available) | |
| [COM11-D985/WP2] United States of America (Q12/11): ISUP Pivot routing - proposed changes | |
| [COM11-D986/WP5] United States of America (Q16/11): Use of SSN values in the international network | |
| [COM11-D987/WP2] France Telecom (Q12/11): Enhancements of ISUP for the support of the service compatibility checks defined in IN CS2 | |
| [COM11-D988/WP2] France Telecom (Q12/11, Q11/11): Proposal for a first draft of new Recommendation Q.699.2, describing the interworking between DSS1 and ISUP for the support of the OCCRUI information | |
| [COM11-D989/WP2] France Telecom (Q12/11): Proposed modifications in the ISUP Pivot routing procedures | |
| [COM11-D990/GEN] Korea Telecom (Q5/11): A reference architecture for integration of internet and IN CS-3.1 | |
| [COM11-D991/WP4] France Telecom (Q5/11, Q22/11): IN CS-4 - Evolution of the call model for call/connection seperation | |
| [COM11-D992/WP4] France Telecom (Q5/11, Q22/11): IN CS-3 - Impact of the broadband introduction on the call model | |
| [COM11-D993/GEN] CSELT (Q16/11, Q25/11): SCCP enhancements to support number portability | |
| [COM11-D994/WP1] United States of America (Q13/11): Changes to Recommendation Q.2723.1 | |
| [COM11-D995/WP1] United States of America (Q13/11): Support of non-E.164 AESA | |
| [COM11-D996/PL] United Kingdom (Q20/11): Concerns on relationship between draft recommendation Q.2961.6 and Recommendation Q.2961.2 | |
| [COM11-D997/GEN] GPT Limited (Q25/11): Report of number portability activities in ETSI SPS1 | |
| [COM11-D998/GEN] GPT Limited (Q20/11, Q11/11): Carriage of synchronisation information to prevent frame slips in voice data | |
| [COM11-D999/GEN] GPT Limited (Q25/11): Relationship between number portability requirements document | |
| [COM11-D1000GEN] United kingdom (Q16/11, Q25/11): Number portability requirements for non-circuit related signalling | |
| [COM11-D1001GEN] United Kingdom (Q25/11): Comments on draft "Definitions, terms and scope of number portability" | |
| [COM11-D1002GEN] United Kingdom (Q25/11): Comments on draft "High level network architecture and generic routeing methods for number portability" | |
| [COM11-D1003GEN] United Kingdom (Q25/11): Comments on draft "Number portability for capacity set 1" | |
| [COM11-D1004GEN] United Kingdom (Q12/11, Q25/11): Geographic location parameter | |
| [COM11-D1005WP1] GPT Limited (Q6/11): Removal of call group from the information model | |
| [COM11-D1006WP1] United Kingdom (Q6/11, Q13/11, Q20/11): Adoption of CS3 information model in CC (rose based) separated protocol | |
| [COM11-D1007WP1] United Kingdom (Q20/11): Use of the broadband high layer information information element by ITU-T Recommendation H.323 | |
| [COM11-D1008WP1] United Kingdom (Q20/11): Comments on conformance test suites for DSS 2 produced by Study Group 7 | |
| [COM11-D1009WP3] United Kingdom (Q8/11): Comments on Q.FIN regarding standardisation of the radio access network | |
| [COM11-D1010WP1] United Kingdom (Q20/11): Proposed test suite structure and test purposes for the user side of Recommendation Q.2971 | |
| [COM11-D1011WP1] United Kingdom (Q20/11): Proposed test suite structure and test purposes for the network side of Recommendation Q.2971 | |
| [COM11-D1012WP2] British Telecom (Q12/11): Comments and issues with the Pivot Routing procedure | |
| [COM11-D1013WP2] British Telecom (Q12/11): Proposal to support the enhanced GVNS requirements | |
| [COM11-D1014WP2] United Kingdom (Q12/11): Calling line identities and definitions | |
| [COM11-D1015WP2] United Kingdom (Q12/11): ISDN User Part coding for calling line identities | |
| [COM11-D1016WP2] Cable & Wireless (Q12/11): Implification of Pivot Routeing procedure | |
| [COM11-D1017WP2] United Kingdom (Q12/11): Proposal for ISUP support of E.412 HTR procedure | |
| [COM11-D1018WP2] United Kingdom (Q12/11): Protocol to support overlap sending for number portability | |
| [COM11-D1019WP2] United Kingdom (11/11, Q12/11): Proposed response to the liaison statement from WP4/11 on support of VPN capabilities on INAP | |
| [COM11-D1020WP1] United Kingdom (Q20/11): Proposed abstract test suite for the user side of Recommendation Q.2971 | |
| [COM11-D1021WP1] United Kingdom (Q20/11): Proposed abstract test suite for the network side of Recommendation Q.2971 | |
| [COM11-D1022] ISOC Internet Society (Q22/1, Q5/11, QSOI/11): Pint WG minutes and presentation slides of the 41st IETF meeting (electronically not available) | |
| [COM11-D1023] ISOC Internet Society (Q22/11, Q5/11, QSOI/11): Charte of the IETF PINT working group (electronically not available) | |
| [COM11-D1024] ISOC Internet Society (Q22/11, Q5/11, QSOI/11): An IETF PINT internet draft (electronically not available) | |
| [COM11-D1025PL] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Q11/11): Comments on Q.931 - COM 11-R 80-E (electronically not available) | |
| [COM11-D1026GEN] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Q6/11, Q13/11, Q20/11, Qall/11): Proposed working framework for B-ISDN & Multimedia Signalling | |
| [COM11-D1027GEN] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Q6/11, Q13/11, Q20/11, Qall/11): Usage of GID and UUI for the support of the internet | |
| [COM11-D1028GEN] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Q25/11, Q12/11): The introduction of performing redirection indicator parameter and redirection reason parameter | |
| [COM11-D1029GEN] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Q25/11): Call rerouted from donor network by use of dropback (redirection) principles | |
| [COM11-D1030GEN] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Q12/11, Q25/11): Proposal of new NOA values for routing number | |
| [COM11-D1031GEN] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Q25/11): Proposal of new parameter and parameter values for ported user on INAP | |
| [COM11-D1032rGE] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Q7/11, Q11/11, Q12/11): Clarification of delivery of calling LI and calling UPTN in two calling number delivery option case | |
| [COM11-D1033GEN] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Q7/11, Q11/11): Proposal of called UPTN mapping on DSS1 | |
| [COM11-D1034WP1] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Q6/11): Proposed direction for developing TRQ.2001 | |
| [COM11-D1035WP1] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Q13/11): Applicability of the new assignment procedure | |
| [COM11-D1036WP1] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Q6/11, Q13/11, Q20/11): Possible configurations for AAL type 2 signalling | |
| [COM11-D1037WP1] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Q20/11, Q13/11); Required signalling protocol functions for AAL type 2 | |
| [COM11-D1038WP2] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Q12/11): Clarification for the UUI transportation to the subsequent connection at SSP | |
| [COM11-D1039WP2] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Q12/11): Modification for definitions of "redirecting reason" in Recommendation Q.762 and Q.732 | |
| [COM11-D1040WP2] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Q12/11): Clarification of delivery of "progress indicator No.4" in Recommendation Q.699 | |
| [COM11-D1041WP2] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Q11/11): Clarification for the message which includes facility information element | |
| [COM11-D1042WP2] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Q12/11): Proposal for the original called in number parameter | |
| [COM11-D1043WP4] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Q5/11, Q22/11): Comment to the methods definition for in CS-3 | |
| [COM11-D1044WP5] Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (Q16/11): Clarification of issues on applying global title prohibited (GTP) procedure | |
| [COM11-D1045GEN] United Kingdom (Q5/11, Q8/11): Meeting IMT2000 requirements within IN CS4 | |
