|
| List of Delayed Contributions (Meeting: 22 November - 10 December 1999) | |
| [COM11-D1444] Telecommunication Administration of the Russian Federation (Q5/11 & SoI/11): Requirements for in-interaction with H.323 system | |
| [COM11-D1445] People's Republic of China (Q8/11): Attach procedure and suggestions on Q.fif | |
| [COM11-D1446] People's Republic of China (Q8/11): Modification on SMS notification transfer in Q.fif | |
| [COM11-D1447] Siemens Switzerland Ltd (Q9/11 & SoI) : Q.115 - Inclusion of clauses describing echo control logic in VoIP gateway and ATM trunking gateway | |
| [COM11-D1448] KPN (Q5/11, 22/11): IN-controlled traffic management: monitoring the traffic | |
| [COM11-D1449] KPN (Q22/11): New INAP operation 'Callfiltering' for IN-controlled traffic management | |
| [COM11-D1450] VIAG Interkom GmbH & Co. (Q11/11(for action), Q12, 20, 21, 22/11, JQG 3 and WP 2/11-WP 4/11(for info)): Proposed new Appendix to Q.GFT describing benefits and capabilities of the GAT protocol | |
| [COM11-D1451] VIAG Interkom GmbH & Co. (Q11/11): Relation of the GAT protocol to H.450.1 | |
| [COM11-D1452] VIAG Interkom GmbH & Co. (Q11/11, Q12/11): Service provider selection for services using the GAT protocol | |
| [COM11-D1453sum] Telekom Austria AG (Q12/11): Draft new ITU-T Recommendation Q.699 BIS - TSS & TP (summary) | |
| [COM11-D1453] Telekom Austria AG (Q12/11): Draft new ITU-T Recommendation Q.699 BIS - TSS & TP (complete document) | |
| [COM11-D1454] United States of America (Q13/11, Q20/11, Q22/11): Q.INBISDN: Discussion of mapping for keypad facility and display | |
| [COM11-D1455] United States of America (Q13/11, Q20/11, Q22/11): Q.INBISDN: Discussion of mapping for facility and extended facility | |
| [COM11-D1456] United States of America (Q13/11, Q20/11, Q22/11): Q.INBISDN: Discussion of mapping for feature activation and feature indication | |
| [COM11-D1457] United States of America (Q13/11, Q20/11, Q22/11): Q.INBISDN: Discussion of mapping for SPID and endpoint identifier | |
| [COM11-D1458] United States of America (Q13/11, Q22/11): Q.INBISDN: Discussion of mapping for for Generic Digits | |
| [COM11-D1459] United States of America (Q5/11, Q13/11, Q20/11, Q22/11): Q.INBISDN: Requirements to support AAL Type 2 Signalling, draft Q2630.1 | |
| [COM11-D1460] United States of America (Q22/11): Q.INBISDN: Discussion of Transit Network Selection | |
| [COM11-D1461] United States of America (Q22/11): Q.INBISDN: Discussion of Generic Identifier Transport trigger | |
| [COM11-D1462] United States of America (Q22/11): Q.INBISDN: Discussion of Implicit Disarming Rules for O/T_Modify DPs | |
| [COM11-D1463] United States of America (Q22/11): Q.INBISDN: Discussion of CSCV transitions on DP notification | |
| [COM11-D1464] United States of America (Q22/11): Q.INBISDN: InitiateCallAttempt operation | |
| [COM11-D1465] United States of America (Q22/11): Q.INBISDN: Text for O/T_Modify PICs and DPs | |
| [COM11-D1466] NTT (QALL/11): Proposals on framework related to the IMT-2000 project | |
| [COM11-D1467] NTT (Q6/11, 21/11 (NSoverBB)): General requirements for the interface between call control and bearer control | |
| [COM11-D1468] NTT (Q13/11, Q20/11 AAL2): Proposed protocol for AAL type 2 signalling CS2- AAL type 2 link characteristics modification | |
| [COM11-D1469] NTT (Q6/11): Proposed requirements for AAL type 2 signalling CS2- AAL type 2 link characteristics modification | |
| [COM11-D1470] NTT (Q6/11, Q13/11, Q20/11 AAL2): Proposed schedule for developing AAL type 2 signalling CS2 | |
| [COM11-D1471] Japan Telecom, NEC, NTT (Q13/11, Q20/11): Editorial amendments to Q.2630.1 | |
| [COM11-D1472] United Kingdom (Q all): Proposal to reclaim data user part service indicators, and to discontinue the data user part | |
| [COM11-D1473] Siemens Switzerland LTD (Q9/11): Q115: Proposed text for VoIP gateway | |
| [COM11-D1474] United Kingdom (Q16/11): Proposed changes to Q.706 | |
| [COM11-D1475] United Kingdom (Q16/11): Additional congestion control test for inclusion in Q.781 | |
| [COM11-D1476] Siemens Switzerland LTD (Q9/11): Q.ECD: Draft new Recommendation Q.ECD | |
| [COM11-D1477] Siemens Switzerland LTD (Q9/11): Q115: Proposed text for ATM trunking gateway | |
| [COM11-D1478] L.M. Ericsson (Q12/11): Editorial comments on Q.764 | |
| [COM11-D1479] Russian Federation (Q16/11): Inconsistency between Q706 and E733 and queuing delay calculations in Q706 | |
| [COM11-D1480] United States of America (Q5/11 for action, Q12 & Q22/11 for information): Management aspects and requirements for network test call with travelling log capability | |
| [COM11-D1481] United States of America (Q5 & 22/11 for action, Q11 & Q12/11 for information): Network test call with travelling log implementation guidelines | |
| [COM11-D1482] United States of America (Q5 & 22/11 for information, Q12/11 for action): Network test call with travelling log formats, codes, and signalling procedures | |
| [COM11-D1483] United States of America (Q12/11 for action, Joint 6 & 21/11 for information): BICC blocking and unblocking procedures for individual CICs | |
| [COM11-D1484] United States of America (Q12/11 for action, Joint 6 & 21/11 for information: Impact of flow changes on BICC protocol | |
| [COM11-D1485] Telecommunication Administration of the Russian Federation (Q13/11 (B-ISUP)): Editorial change for draft Recommendation Q.2763 | |
| [COM11-D1486] Telecommunication Administration of the Russian Federation (Q13 & 12/11 (ISUP, B-ISUP)): Clash of message code allocation in ISUP and B-ISUP | |
| [COM11-D1487] Telecommunication Administration of the Russian Federation (Q12/11 (ISUP): Editorial change to Annex H of Recommendation Q.764 | |
| [COM11-D1488] United States of America (Q12/11): Signalling support for calls terminating in mobile/wireless networks | |
| [COM11-D1489] BT (Q5/11, Q22/11 (for information): Consideration of API documents for new work area on the API for 3RD party service application interface | |
| [COM11-D1490] BT (Q5/11, Q22/11 (for information): API contributions: Sequence diagrams and class diagrams | |
| [COM11-D1491] BT (Q5/11, Q22/11 (for information): API contributions: Part 9 Common data definitions | |
| [COM11-D1492] BT (Q5/11, Q22/11 (for information): API contributions: Part 8 Framework data definitions | |
| [COM11-D1493] BT (Q5/11, Q22/11 (for information): API contributions: Part 5 Generic call control service data definitions | |
| [COM11-D1494] BT (Q5/11, Q22/11 (for information): API contributions: Part 7 Generic messaging service data definitions | |
| [COM11-D1495] BT (Q5/11, 22/11): API Contributions: Part 6 generic user interaction service data definitions | |
| [COM11-D1496] BT (Q5/11, Q22/11): API Contributions: Part 10 OMG-IDL specification | |
| [COM11-D1497] BT (Q5/11): API Contributions: Part 10 class diagrams | |
| [COM11-D1498] BT (Q5/11, Q22/11): API Contributions: Part 11 sequence diagrams | |
| [COM11-D1499] BT (Q5/11, Q22/11): API Contributions: Part 4 framework interface class descriptions | |
| [COM11-D1500] BT (Q5/11, Q22/11): API Contributions: Part 1 generic call control service interfaces description | |
| [COM11-D1501] BT (Q5/11, Q22/11): API Contributions: Part 3 generic messaging service interfaces description | |
| [COM11-D1502] BT (Q5/11, Q22/11): API Contributions: Part 2 generic user interaction service interfaces description | |
| [COM11-D1503] BT (Q11/11, Q12/11, Q22/11): Issues drawn from the draft general overview document to define DSS1 extensions for IN/ISDN interaction | |
| [COM11-D1504] United Kingdom (all Q): Comments on new question project description | |
| [COM11-D1505] UK (Q12/11): Changes to the ISUP 2000 text (Q.762 & Q.763) proposed for decision under resolution 1 at this meeting | |
| [COM11-D1506] UK (Q12/11): Derivation of compatibility information for APM | |
| [COM11-D1507] United Kingdom (Q8/11, Q23/11, Q24/11): The future of SG11 IMT 2000 studies | |
| [COM11-D1508] United Kingdom (Q12/11): Enhancement of APM segmentation mechanism II | |
| [COM11-D1509] United Kingdom (Q12/11): Enhancement of APM segmentation mechanism I | |
| [COM11-D1510] United Kingdom (Q12/11): Enhancement of APM segmentation mechanism I | |
| [COM11-D1511] United Kingdom (Q12/11): Enhancement of APM segmentation mechanism II | |
| [COM11-D1512] Nortel Network, UK (Q12711): Notes of AD HOC discussions on CIC encoding at the Ottawa Rapporteurs meeting | |
| [COM11-D1513] Nortel Networks, UK (Q12/11): Transport of cause values in Q.765.1 | |
| [COM11-D1514] Nortel Network (Q5/11, Q22/11): Proposed mapping between intelligent network (IN) and distributed gateway (H.248/megaco) architectures | |
| [COM11-D1515] Siemens AG (Q15/11): Clarifications and editorial corrections to draft Q.2111 | |
| [COM11-D1516] Siemens AG (Q12/11, Q10/11, Q16/11, Q22/11, Q25/11): Including performance considerations in Q730 | |
| [COM11-D1517] Alcatel (Q16/11): SCCP restart | |
| [COM11-D1518] Alcatel (Q16/11): Clarification on message type changes | |
| [COM11-D1519] Alcatel (Q22/11): Proposal for reporting the cause value with DP no_answer | |
| [COM11-D1520] United States of America (Q20/11): Proposed editorial correction to ATM forum example in draft Q.2941.2 | |
| [COM11-D1521] France Telecom (Q12/11): Modification to Q.763 2000 | |
| [COM11-D1522] France Telecom (Q12/11): Enhancements of ISUP for the support of the service compatibility checks defined in IN CS2 | |
| [COM11-D1523] NTT and Telia (all Q): Proposed study approach in the area of API/object interface for SG11 in the new Study Period | |
| [COM11-D1524] OKI Electric Industry Co., LTD (Q20/11): Editorial changes to Q.2963.1 edition 2 | |
| [COM11-D1525r1] United States of America (Q20/11): Proposed correction to OUI coding in Q.2931 | |
| [COM11-D1526] Japan Telecom (Q6/11): Proposed AAL type 2 signalling requirement CS2 - AAL type 2 path characteristics | |
| [COM11-D1527] Japan Telecom (Q13/11, Q20/11): Proposed AAL type 2 signalling protocol CS2-AAL type 2 path characteristics | |
| [COM11-D1528] Siemens AG (Q11/11): Living list for amendments to Recommendation Q.932 | |
| [COM11-D1529] Alcatel (Q22/11): Proposal for clarifying Copenhagen issues: RRBE and queuing | |
| [COM11-D1530] Alcatel (Q22/11): Proposal for clarifying Copenhagen issues: Rules to use LegID and CSID in user interaction operations | |
| [COM11-D1531] National working group on ITU Study Group 11, Department of Telecommunications India (Q12/11, Q22/11, Q21/11): Enhanced signalling requirements for charging in multioperator environment | |
| [COM11-D1532] United States of America (Q13/11, Q12/11, Q6/11, Q21/11, Q20/11): BICC and B-ISUP mapping for AAL type 1 adaptation | |
| [COM11-D1533] United States of America (Q13/11, Q12/11, 6/11, Q20/11, Q21/11): Enhancements to Recommendation Q.2726.4 | |
| [COM11-D1534] France Télécom (Q8/11, Q24/11): General aspects for the IMT-2000 mobility management over the NNI | |
| [COM11-D1535] France Télécom (Q8/11, Q24/11): Support of H323 mobility management by IMT-2000 | |
| [COM11-D1536] France Télécom (Q8/11, Q24/11): IMT-2000: Parameters status for the generic mobility management protocol over the NNI | |
| [COM11-D1537] France Télécom (Q8/11, Q24/11): Protocol stack for the IMT-2000 mobility management over the NNI | |
| [COM11-D1538] BT (Q all): New SG11 questions | |
| [COM11-D1539] United States of America (Q12/11): Comments on Q.763 | |
| [COM11-D1540] Siemens AG (Q13/11): Editorial comments on draft revised Recommendation Q.2764 | |
| [COM11-D1541] Siemens AG (Q13/11): Editorial comments on draft revised Recommendation Q.2761 | |
| [COM11-D1542] Siemens AG (Q13(/11): Editorial comments on draft revised Recommendation Q.2762 | |
| [COM11-D1543] Siemens AG (Q13/11): Editorial comments on draft revised Recommendation Q.2763 | |
| [COM11-D1544] Siemens AG (Q13/11, Q20/11): Editorial comments on draft revised Recommendation Q.2650 | |
| [COM11-D1545] Siemens AG (Q13/11): Editorial comments on draft new Recommendation Q.2765 | |
| [COM11-D1546] KDD (Q12/11): Proposal on draft text of signalling procedures and signalling information for tandem mode operation of Digital Multiplexing Equipment with Low-bit-rate Voice CODEC (DME with LVC) | |
| [COM11-D1547] United States of America (Q16/11 (MTP)): Criteria for emergency link set restart | |
| [COM11-D1548] United States of America (Q16/11 (MTP)): Identification of new MTP User Parts when Service Indicator (SI) values are exhausted | |
| [COM11-D1549] United States of America (Q16/11 (SCCP)): Reservation of code values for national use | |
| [COM11-D1550] United States of America (Q22/11): Proposed additional ASN.1 descriptions for in support of BISDN | |
| [COM11-D1551] Lucent Technologies (Q8, 23 & 24/11) : Q.FIF version 17.0 Review summary | |
| [COM11-D1552] Vodafone Ltd. (Q12/11) : Additional geodetic shape descriptions and velocity description for post-2000 ISUP Recommendations | |
| [COM11-D1553] Swisscom Ltd. (Q12/11): User part availability procedures | |
| [COM11-D1554] L.M.Ericsson (Q5 & 22/11): Q.1238.2 proposed clarifying text on issues from the Q22 editor's meeting report | |
| [COM11-D1555] L. M. Ericsson (Q6 & 21/11) : Proposed requirements for BICC CS2 | |
| [COM11-D1556] L.M. Ericsson (Q6 & 21/11) : Proposed meeting schedule for year 2000, regarding BICC CS2 | |
| [COM11-D1557] KPN (Q6 to 21/11 (BICC requirements CS1), Q12/11 (BICC protocol)): Choice of BICC bearer set-up direction between network operator domains | |
| [COM11-D1558] L.M. Ericsson (Q9/11) : Block diagrams and SDL diagrams for data link protocol in Q.55 | |
| [COM11-D1559] L.M. Ericsson (Q9/11) : Suggested editorial changes to draft new Recommendation Q.55 | |
| [COM11-D1560] KPN (Q12/1): Reservation spare APRI value in ITU-T Recommendation Q.763 (COM 11-R 155) | |
| [COM11-D1561] KPN (New Questions and Q5, 6, 12, 21 & 22/11): Scope of CS2 of BICC, Bearer Independent Call Control | |
| [COM11-D1562] KPN, Alcatel Bell, Marconi Communications, BT, Telia, Lucent Technologies France and Lucent Technologies NL (SoI,New Questions and Q6, 12, 16 & 21/11): Identification of potential new work areas for BICC CS2 and IP protocol work | |
| [COM11-D1563] KPN (Q12/11 N-ISUP): Enhancement "full message" handling of ISUP simple segmentation procedure for BICC and GFT-control in ITU-T Recommendation Q.764 (COM 11-R 156) | |
| [COM11-D1564] KPN, Siemens ATEA, Alcatel Bell, Marconi Communications, BT, Telia, Lucent Technologies France and Lucent Technologies NL (SoI,New Questions and Q6, 12, 16 & 21/11): Results and conclusions of discussions at ETSI span workshop on IP matters | |
| [COM11-D1565] L.M. Ericsson (Q6/11) : Proposed requirements for AAL type 2 signalling CS2 | |
| [COM11-D1566] L.M. Ericsson (Q6, 13 & 20/11) : Proposed meeting schedule for year 2000, regarding AAL type 2 signalling CS2 | |
| [COM11-D1567] Lucent Technologies Netherlands (Q24/11) : Proposed additions to draft Recommendation Q.1751 version 7.1 | |
| [COM11-D1568] L.M. Ericsson (Q12/11): Comments on draft Recommendation Q.765 | |
| [COM11-D1569] L.M. Ericsson (Q12/11): Comments on draft Recommendation Q.765.BICC | |
| [COM11-D1570] L.M. Ericsson (Q12/11): Transport of BICC related information | |
| [COM11-D1571r1] L.M. Ericsson (Q9/11): Block diagrams and SDL diagrams for the timeslot 0 protocol in Q.55 | |
| [COM11-D1572] KPN (Q12/11 N-ISUP): Enhancement "full message" handling of APM segmentation procedure for BICC and GFT-control in ITU-T Recommendation Q.765 | |
| [COM11-D1573] France Telecom (Q12/11): Comments to draft Recommendation Q.765.BICC | |
| [COM11-D1574] France Telecom (Q12/11): Comments to draft Recommendation Q.BICC | |
| [COM11-D1575] France Telecom (Q12/11): ISUP enhancement for carrier selection | |
| [COM11-D1576] France Telecom (Q12/11): VPN interaction with IN | |
| [COM11-D1577] Telekom Austria AG (Q12/11): Q.699 TSS & TP, SS | |
| [COM11-D1578] France Telecom (Q22 & 5/11): CCF connection model : Use of H.248 | |
| [COM11-D1579] United Kingdom (Q14/11): Extension of scope of ITU-T Recommendations Q.920 and Q.921 to include PINX-PINX support | |
| [COM11-D1580] Alcatel (Q16/11) : Considerations on GTP mechanism | |
| [COM11-D1581] KPN (Q11/11 DSS1, Q12/11 N-ISUP, Q20/11 DSS2): Discussion on open issues draft Recommendation Q.GFT (Generic Addressing and Transport (GAT) protocol) | |
| [COM11-D1582] Deutsche Telekom AG (Q13, 12, 6, 21 & 20/11): Clarifications to the Delayed Contribution from USA "BICC and B-ISUP mapping for AAL type 1 adaptation" | |
| [COM11-D1583] L.M. Ericsson (Q6 & 21/11, 12/11) : BNC characteristics | |
| [COM11-D1584] L.M. Ericsson (Q6,12 & 21/11): BICC message length for MTP3 and MTP3B | |
| [COM11-D1585] L.M. Ericsson (Q6 & 21/11): Comments on draft signalling requirements for the support of narrow band services via broadband transport technologies | |
| [COM11-D1586] United States of America (Q6, 12 & 21/11): Proposed modification to subclause 8.1.1 of the draft BICC signalling requirements | |
| [COM11-D1587] United States of America (Q6, 12 & 21/11): Proposed modification to subclause 8.1.2 of the draft BICC signalling requirements | |
| [COM11-D1588] United States of America (Q6, 12 & 21/11): Proposed modification to subclause 8.1.3.1 of the draft BICC signalling requirements | |
| [COM11-D1589] United States of America (Q6, 12 & 21/11): Proposed modification to subclause 8.1.3.2 of the draft BICC signalling requirements | |
| [COM11-D1590] United States of America (Q6, 12 & 21/11): Proposed modification to subclause 8.1.5 of the draft BICC signalling requirements | |
| [COM11-D1591] United States of America (Q6, 12 & 21/11): Proposed modification to subclause 8.1.6 of the draft BICC signalling requirements | |
| [COM11-D1592] United States of America (Q6, 12 & 21/11): Proposed modification to subclause 8.1.7 of the draft BICC signalling requirements | |
| [COM11-D1593] United States of America (Q6, 12 & 21/11): Proposed modification to subclause 8.1.8 of the draft BICC signalling requirements | |
| [COM11-D1594] United States of America (Q6, 12 & 21/11): Proposed modification to subclause 8.1.11 of the draft BICC signalling requirements | |
| [COM11-D1595] United States of America (Q6, 9, 11, 12 & ALL/11 (SOI)): PSTN aspects of voice-over-packet interworking | |
| [COM11-D1596] United States of America (Q9/11 & SOI): Echo control logic for voice over IP in Rec. Q.115 | |
| [COM11-D1597] France Telecom (Q12, 13 & 20/11): Comments on the BICC and DSS2 mapping for AAL type 1 trunking | |
| [COM11-D1598] France Telecom (Q22 & 12/11): Rules for signalling interactions | |
| [COM11-D1599] Canada (Q16 & 17/11): Deletion of Recommendation Q.741 | |
| [COM11-D1600r1] Canada (Q15/11, Q16/11 & SoI) : IETF internet drafts for IP signaling transport and SS7 adaptation | |
| [COM11-D1601] United States of America (Q11 & 20/11): Request for codepoints for signalling GFR service | |
| [COM11-D1602] United States of America (Q11 & 20/11): Request to reserve message codepoints for Path and Connection Trace | |
| [COM11-D1603] L.M. Ericsson (QALL/11): Requirements and modelling of a mobility management state model within LMFH | |
| [COM11-D1604r1] Switzerland (Q13 & 20/11 (AAL2)): Editorial modifications to Q.2630.1 | |
| [COM11-D1605] United States of America (9/11): Editorial change to Annex G of Recommendation Q.55 for a LAN application | |
| [COM11-D1606] France Telecom (Q20 & 13/11 on AAL2 Signalling): Proposed clarification of Q.2630.1 and Q.2941.2 relationship | |
| [COM11-D1607] Canada (Qall/11): Need for consistent application of Recommendation A.5 | |
| [COM11-D1608] Canada (Q6, 13 & 20/11, SoI, New Questions): Topics to be addressed in IP signalling framework | |
| [COM11-D1609r1] Swisscom Ltd. (Q13 & 20/11 AAL2): SDL diagrams for Q.2630.1 | |
| [COM11-D1610] France Telecom (Q20/11 DSS2): Comments on Recommendation Q.2065.1 | |
| [COM11-D1611] France Telecom (Q20/11 DSS2): Comments on the living list of Recommendation Q.2961.2 | |
| [COM11-D1612R1] United States of America (Q20/11): Interworking of extended QoS IE | |
| [COM11-D1613] Nortel Networks UK (Q12/11): Proposed text for enhanced APM segmentation procedures | |
| [COM11-D1614] L.M. Ericsson (Q12/11): Procedure for abnormal cases with codec negotiation | |
| [COM11-D1615] L.M. Ericsson (Q12/11): Compatibility mechanism for Q.765.BICC | |
| [COM11-D1616] L.M. Ericsson (Q12/11): Draft new annex D to Q.BICC | |
| [COM11-D1617] France Telecom (Q11/11 DSS1, Q12/11 N-ISUP): Proposed resolution of open issues in current draft Q.GFT (Generic Addressing and Transport protocol) | |
| [COM11-D1618] France Telecom (Q11/11 DSS1, Q12/11 N-ISUP): Service provider selection in the context of the Generic Addressing and Transport protocol (Q.GFT) | |
| [COM11-D1619] Canada (Q11/11): Future of Recommendation Q.933 | |
| [COM11-D1620] L.M. Ericsson (AB) on behalf of 3GPP TSG CN-2 (Q12/11): References to 3GPP codec information | |
| [COM11-D1621] L.M. Ericsson Sweden (Q8/11): Over The Air Service Provisioning (OTASP) | |
| [COM11-D1622] L.M. Ericsson Sweden (Q23/11): Comments on draft Q.FSU (Q.1741) | |
| [COM11-D1623] L.M. Ericsson Sweden (Q8/11): Contribution to draft Q.1701 supplement | |
| [COM11-D1624] L.M. Ericsson Sweden on behalf of 3GPP TSG-CN (Q8/11): Feedback on the Q.1701 supplement from 3GPP TSG-CN | |
| [COM11-D1625] L.M. Ericsson (AB) on behalf of 3GPP TSG-CN (Q24/11): Response communication to ITU-T Study Group 11 | |
| [COM11-D1626] Alcatel, BT, Ericsson, Nokia, Omnipoint, Samsung, Siemens, Telia, T-Mobil on behalf of 3GPP TSG-SA (Q8/11): 3GPP TSG-SA position on "Supplement to Recommendation Q.1701" | |
| [COM11-D1627] L.M. Ericsson on behalf of 3GPP TSG-T (Sweden (Q8/11): Feedback on the Q.1701 supplement from 3GPP TSG-T | |
| [COM11-D1628] France Telecom (Q22/11, Q5/11): Refinement of the CCF/SSF modelling | |
| [COM11-D1629] Swisscom Ltd. (Q15/11): Draft new ITU-T Recommendation Q.2150.3 Signalling transport converter on MTP | |
| [COM11-D1630] Siemens Atea (Q16/11) : Draft revised ITU-T Recommendation Q.715 | |
| [COM11-D1631] NTT (Q22/11): Comments on SCF-SCF interface (Q1238.6) draft | |
| [COM11-D1632] NTT Corporation (Q22/11): Comments on SCF-SSF interface (Q1238.2) draft | |
| [COM11-D1633] NTT (Q22/11): Proposal on detail specifications for enhanced SCF-SCF interface (IN CS-4) | |
| [COM11-D1634] NTT Corporation (Q22/11): Proposal on surrogate and shared state of controlling LEG (IN CS4) | |
| [COM11-D1635] Federal Republic of Germany (Q12/11): Comments to ISUP 2000 | |
| [COM11-D1636] Federal Republic of Germany (Q13/11): Proposed new working item: AESA/NSAP based network call correlation identifier | |
| [COM11-D1637] Federal Republic of Germany (Q12/11): N-ISDN/INAP-Interworking for number portability | |
| [COM11-D1638] Federal Republic of Germany (Q12/11): Not handled liaisons received from WP 4 in March 99 | |
| [COM11-D1639] Federal Republic of Germany (Q2/11): Improvement of Q751.3 object model to combine MTP incoming linkset screening and accounting | |
| [COM11-D1640] Federal Republic of Germany (Q16/11): Extending service indicator resources | |
| [COM11-D1641] Federal Republic of Germany (Q2/11): Precision of return values in the current route test | |
| [COM11-D1642] Federal Republic of Germany (Q2/11): Misleading MRVT result by current procedure for unknown parameters, inconsistency Q751.1 - Q.754 | |
| [COM11-D1643] NTT & Telia (all Q): Proposed study approach in the area of API/object interface for SG 11 in the next study period | |
| [COM11-D1644] PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia (Q5/11): Identification of information that should be exchanged between the intelligent network and the IP network for Internet call waiting benchmarking service | |
| [COM11-D1645] ETSI (Q22/11): SDLs for Q.1238-2, Annex A | |
| [COM11-D1646] China (People's Republic of) (Q5/11): Modification to the functional architecture for IN support of IP-networks | |
| [COM11-D1647] China (People's Republic of) (Q5/11): Requirements for IN-Interaction with H.323 systems | |
| [COM11-D1648] China (Q15/11): Comments on Q.2111 for congestion control and connection establishment | |
| [COM11-D1649] Siemens AG (Q20/11): Clarifications on draft Recommendation Q.2951.9 | |
| [COM11-D1650] Siemens AG (Q20/11): Editorial comments on draft new Recommendation Q.2965.2 | |
| [COM11-D1651] Siemens (Q12/11) : N-ISDN/INAP interworking for bearer unrelated connections | |
| [COM11-D1652] L.M. Ericsson (Q12/11) : Comments on draft Recommendation Q.BICC | |
