|
| List of Delayed Contributions (Meeting: 7 - 18 April 1997) | |
| [COM12-D001] Rapporteur question 14/12 (Q14/12): Terms of reference for subjective performance of echo cancellers: A starting point | |
| [COM12-D002] Rapporteur question 14/12 (Q14/12): Outline for draft Recommendation P.SEEC (Subjective Evaluation of Echo Canceller Performance) | |
| [COM12-D003] BT, Ericsson, COMSAT, HEAD acoustics, Deutsche telekom AG (Q14/12): Revision of proposed draft text for new recommendation P.SEEC contained in COM12-11 | |
| [COM12-D004] Canada (Q9/12, Q12/12): Stensor Resource Centre Inc. | |
| [COM12-D005] Canada: Nortel (Q8/12): Conversion factors between ITU-Rec. P.79 and IEEE STD 661 objective loundness ratings | |
| [COM12-D006] Canada: Nortel (Q6/12, Q9/12): Method for objective evaluation of acoustic echo cancellation in a hands-free telephone | |
| [COM12-D007] Canada: Nortel (Q16/12, Q20/12): Impairment factor of GSM-EFR Codec | |
| [COM12-D008] Canada: Nortel (Q20/12): E-model work program | |
| [COM12-D009] Canada: Nortel (Q20/12): User perception of total quality for wired vs. wireless telephones | |
| [COM12-D009cor] Canada: Nortel (Q20/12): User perception of total quality for wired vs. wireless telephones | |
| [COM12-D010] CSELT, Italy (Q15/12): INMD DAT Tape: Measurement results | |
| [COM12-D011] CSELT, Italy (Q17/12): Background noise classification in mobile environments using fuzzy logic | |
| [COM12-D012] Rapporteur Question 14/12 (Q14/12, Q16/12): Subjective evaluation of echo canceller performance: Sidetone and ambient noise; impairment factors | |
| [COM12-D013] BOSCH Telecom GmbH (Q18/12): Overall speech quality aspects in future network scenarios | |
| [COM12-D014] ITALTEL (Q17/12): Digital-Signal-Processing-Based procedure for impulsive noise detection | |
| [COM12-D015] AT&T(Q15/12): Evaluation of speech tapes for INMD testing | |
| [COM12-D016] AT&T (Q15/12): Analysis of the correlation between INMD measurements and customer opinion model parameters | |
| [COM12-D017] United States of America (Q11/12): Proposed sections for a draft new Recommendation on multimedia communication delay, synchronization, and frame rate measurement | |
| [COM12-D018] United States of America (Q13/12): Expanding the applicability of objective speech quality measures | |
| [COM12-D019] United States of America (Q10/12, Q11/12): Performance assessment of audio, video, and multimedia quality | |
| [COM12-D020] United States of America (Q10/12, Q11/12): Comments on COM12-7, objective measures of video quality | |
| [COM12-D021] United States of America (Q10/12, Q11/12): Objective and subjective measures of MPEG video quality: Summary of experimental results | |
| [COM12-D022] Federal Republic of Germany (Q8/12, Q12/12): Impedance measurements of handsets used for evaluating the DRP-ERP correction procedure | |
| [COM12-D023] Deutsche Telekom AG (Q6/12, Q14/12, SQEG): Comparison of results of different subjective evaluation procedures for hands-free telephones | |
| [COM12-D024] Bellcore (Q10/12): The impact of one way delay on video conferencing quality (not electronically available!) | |
| [COM12-D025] Bellcore (Q10/12): The effect of delay on multipoint video conferencing systems (not electronically available!) | |
| [COM12-D026] BT (Q15/12): Delay measurement algorithm test results | |
| [COM12-D027] United Kingdom (Q1/12): Review of Recommendations that are the responsibility of Study Group 12 | |
| [COM12-D028] Sweden: Editorial comments on draft Recommendations P.64, G.175 and G.176 (not electronically available!) | |
| [COM12-D029] United States of America (Q13/12): Additional detail on MNB algorithm performance | |
