|
| List of Delayed Contributions (Meeting: 7 - 16 October 1997) | |
| [COM8-D49] United Kingdom (Q1/8): Reasons for non-approval of Draft New Annex X to Recommendation T.30 | |
| [COM8-D50] United Kingdom (Q4/8): Proposed Amendments to New Draft Recommendation T.IFAX | |
| [COM8-D51] United States of America (Q1/8): Quality of Fascimile Communications | |
| [COM8-D52] Italy (Q1/8): Test Campaign on G3 fascimile communication over mobile networks | |
| [COM8-D53] Israel (Q4/8): Proposed protocol for Real Time Fascimile Document Transfer over Internet | |
| [COM8-D54] Deutsche Telekom AG (Q1/8): Internet Fascimile - General Comments | |
| [COM8-D55] Germany (Q1/8): T4-Timer for manual and automatic units | |
| [COM8-D56] Deutsche Telekom AG (Q1/8): Internet Fascimile - "Service-definition" | |
| [COM8-D57] Germany (Q1/8): Maximum response time | |
| [COM8-D58] Japan (Q1/8): Comments on proposed new draft Annex X to Recommendation T.30 - Extended negotiations protocol | |
| [COM8-D59] Japan (Q1/8): Proposal of cause value for a G4 Fax fallback (based on TD2031) | |
| [COM8-D60] Canon, Matsushita, Mitsubishi, NEC, OKI, Ricoh, Toshiba (Q1/8) : Proposal for required amendment clarifying EOS procedure | |
| [COM8-D61] Canon, Matsushita, Mitsubishi, NEC, OKI, Ricoh, Toshiba (Q4/8): Proposed primitive mode of store-and-forward Internet fascimile | |
| [COM8-D62] Canon, Matsushita, Mitsubishi, NEC, OKI, Ricoh, Toshiba (Q1/8): Reply to the CM22 proposal by Germany at Costa Mesa meeting in June 1997 and Proposal of addition and modification about Note 31 in Table 2/T.30 | |
| [COM8-D63] Canon, Matsushita, Mitsubishi, NEC, OKI, Ricoh, Toshiba (Q1/8): T4 Timer for manual and automatic units | |
| [COM8-D64] Canon, Matsushita, Mitsubishi, NEC, OKI, Ricoh, Toshiba (Q1/8): Change request on table 2 of Recommendation T.30 | |
| [COM8-D65] Deutsche Telekom AG (Q4/8): Request for use of ASN.1 in T.Ifax | |
| [COM8-D66] Deutsche Telekom AG (Q4/8): Support for Group 4 Fascimile in T.Ifax | |
| [COM8-D67] Rapporteur Q.5/8 (Q1,5/8): Meeting Report of Question 5/8 Interim meeting, May 13-16, 1997 | |
| [COM8-D68] Editor - Annex X/T.30 (Q1/8): Revisions to draft Annex X and the main body of Rec. T.30 for extended negotiations | |
| [COM8-D69] Japan (Q1/8): Proposed simple BFT negotiation method within phrase C (based on D16) | |
| [COM8-D70] Editor of Recommendation T.563 (Q1/8): Proposed modification to the final draft of Annex X / T.563 | |
| [COM8-D71] United Kingdom (Q4/8): Comments on file format for Internet Fascimile | |
| [COM8-D72] Rapporteur (Q3/8): Result of the review on T.XAPI in rapporteur's group | |
| [COM8-D73] United Kingdom (Q4/8): Proposed revision of new draft Recommendation F.Ifax | |
| [COM8-D74] BT (Q4/8): Internet Fax | |
| [COM8-D75] France (Q4/8): Principles to adopt for E-mail based Internet Fax | |
| [COM8-D76] Canada (Q4/8): Canadian comments on Internet Fax | |
| [COM8-D77] Canada (Q4/8): Tag Image File Format - Application F (TIFF-F) | |
| [COM8-D78] United Kingdom (Q1/8): Draft Annex to T.30: Duplex V.21 negotiations | |
| [COM8-D79] Rapporteur (Q2/8): Extensions to ITU-T Recommendation T.24 | |
| [COM8-D80] Rapporteur (Q1/8): Table 2/T.30 as revised by ad hoc group (CM 55) | |
| [COM8-D81] Rapporteur (Q1/8): Proposed text for inclusion in section 5.3.6.1 of T.30 (CM57) | |
| [COM8-D82] United States of America (Q1/8): Corrigendum on FCLASS 2.1 Amendment to Recommendation T.32 | |
| [COM8-D83] United States of America (Q1/8): Proposed liaison from SG8 to SG16 on V.8 codepoints | |
| [COM8-D84] United States of America (Q1,8, Q3/8): Updated draft Annex B to T.30 - BFT negotiations and diagnostic messages | |
| [COM8-D85] United States of America (Q1/8, Q3/8): Proposed amendments to Rec. T.30 in support of BFT negotiations | |
| [COM8-D86] United States of America (Q1/8): Proposed action plan for extended negotiations | |
| [COM8-D87] United States of America (Q1/8, Q4/8): Fascimile over IP networks | |
| [COM8-D88] United States of America (Q1/8, Q5/8): Proposal to simplify negotiation bits for Mixed Raster Content | |
| [COM8-D89] United States of America (Q1/8): Proposed refinements to draft Annex X - Extended negotiations | |
| [COM8-D90] United States of America (Q1/8, Q4/8): Considerations on requirements for e-mail fascimile | |
| [COM8-D91] Rapporteur (Q1/8): Proposed draft Annex to T.30 on Binary File Transfer negotiations | |
| [COM8-D92] Rapporteur (Q1/8): Proposal for draft Annex to T.30 on Binary File Transfer negotiations (CM 37) | |
| [COM8-D93] Rapporteur (Q1/8): Ad-hoc meeting report | |
