Page 20 - Trust in ICT 2017
P. 20

1                                                    Trust in ICT


            Trust is not transitive in nature but maybe transitive within a given context: That is, if entity A trusts entity
            B, and entity B trusts entity C then entity A may not trust entity C. However A may trust any entity that entity
            B trusts in a given context although this derived trust may be explicit and hard to be quantified.
            Trust is an asymmetric relationship: Thus, trust is a non-mutual reciprocal in nature. That means if entity A
            trust entity B, then the statement “entity B trusts entity A” is not always true.
            The nature of trust is fuzzy, dynamic and complex. Besides asymmetry and transitivity, there are additional
            key characteristics of trust: implicitness, antonymy, asynchrony, and gravity [6] [7].
            Implicit: It is hard to explicitly articulate the confidence, belief, capability, context, and time dependency of
            trust.

            Antonymy: The articulation of trust context in two entities may differ based on the opposing perspective.
            For example, entity A trusts entity B in the context of “buying” book, however from entity B to entity A the
            context is “selling” book.
            Asynchrony: The time period of trusting relationship may be defined differently between the entities. For
            example, entity A trusts entity B for 3 years, however, entity B may think that the trust relationship only last
            for the last 1 year.
            Gravity: The degree of seriousness in trust relationships may differ between the entities. For example, entity
            A may think that its trust with entity B is important, however, entity B may think it differently.

            4.3     Key features of Trust

            4.3.1   Classifications for trust provisioning
            At  architectural  perspective,  trust  can  be  classified  into  three  layers:  data  trust,  information  trust,  and
            knowledge/intelligence trust.
            Depending  on  services  and  applications,  the  trusts  domains  should  be  well  identified  and  measured  at
            objectively or subjectively manners.
            At technical perspectives, trust could be classified into three dimension: technical trust (like data security),
            business/trading/community trust (or credits), and human trust (perceived by individual human or group of
            members). Some mechanisms or solutions of trusts may be accounted by defining trust metric or trust index.
            The capability or attributes of trusts can be also classified into application types, costs, technical complexity,
            and human credibility/reputation. Depending on applications, most of trust solutions may be clarified and
            mapped.

            4.3.2   The Trust Metrics and Technical Attributes

            It  is  challenged  to  determine  the  necessary  and  sufficient  information  that  should  be  used  for  deriving
            measures of trust. Technically, trust is based on several Trust Metrics (TMs) which are generally defined as
            the information used in trustworthiness evaluation process between trustor and trustee. Each TM is derived
            from some Technical Attributes (TAs) as illustrated in Figure 2.























            12
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25