Page 34 - International Standards to Shape Smart Sustainable Cities: The Case of Moscow

Implementing ITU-T International Standards to shape Smart Sustainable Cities - The case of Moscow

3.2. Verification methodology and findings

The verification process of Moscow’s reporting of U4SSC KPIs revealed the following findings:

Total number of indicators 91

KPIs verified: Data presented met the requirements of the KPI(s) and was verifiable. 76

35
No data reported 15

36
Almost 98 per cent of data reported was city (regional) level data, while the remaining 2 per
cent was national level data. Furthermore, close to 93 per cent of the KPI data reported was
based on accurate measurements with just over 5 per cent of the KPIs reported was estimated
based on certain assumptions and just over 1 per cent of KPIs reported was extrapolated based
37
on survey of inhabitants. The results were presented to Moscow in a formal verification
38
report in 2018.
The following graph (Figure 9) illustrates Moscow’s fulfilment of its KPI reporting targets, i.e. the
number of KPIs reported and verified successfully, according to the U4SSC KPI dimensions and
sub-dimensions.
Total Reported Verified % KPIs verified of
total KPIs
Economy
Core KPIs 23 20 20 87%
Advanced KPIs 22 17 17 77%
Environment
Core KPIs 13 11 11 85%
Advanced KPIs 5 3 3 75%
Society & Culture
Core KPIs 19 19 19 100%
Advanced KPIs 10 6 6 60%
Overall
Core KPIs 55 50 50 91%
39
Advanced KPIs 36 26 26 72%
Total 91 76 76 84%

Figure 9: Number of U4SSC KPIs successfully reported by Moscow

35 KPI SC: SH: SA: 3A Resilience Plans was not yet defined at the time of data collection and could not be
reported by Moscow. It is included in the totals but not in the analysis.
36 Because Moscow is a region of the Russian Federation (i.e. on par with other regions), Moscow regional
and city level are the same within the context of data sources from various levels of government.
37 Received as part of Smart City Lab’s answers to ITU’s pre- case study development Preliminary
Questions.
38 For privacy reasons, the entirety of these results has not been presented publicly and the verification
report has been kept confidential.
39 KPI SC: SH: SA: 3A Resilience Plans was not yet defined at the time of data collection and could not be
reported by Moscow. It is included in the totals but not in further analysis within the case study.

22