Page 239 - The Digital Financial Services (DFS) Ecosystem
P. 239

ITU-T Focus Group Digital Financial Services
                                                         Ecosystem



               Figure 9 – Average MNO fee for low value transactions



































               The pricing variation is particularly striking – some MNOs do not charge P2P fees between registered users. It
               is also important to note that MNOs often have a minimum value they will transfer. In Uganda, this amount is
               ~ $0.14. Under this policy, 23 per cent of the transactions would be ineligible for eMoney.

               User experience: The eMoney user experience is not optimal. For remote bill transactions, paying the
               correct business and ensuring payment is credited to the correct account is error-prone. For face-to-face P2P
               transactions, it is easier for someone to reach into their pocket than log into a phone and type the recipient’s
               mobile number. Compelling user experiences are needed for each use case (e.g., ‘bumping’ phones for face-
               to-face P2P transactions).
               Service availability: eMoney is not universally available to all people at all times. Poor or inconsistent mobile
               connectivity encourages eMoney subscribers to rely on cash as the more reliable alternative. Even where
               mobile connectivity is solid, the local MNO may not provide an eMoney offering or, if they do, they may not
               have an adequate agent network to make eMoney a practical offering.

               Role of eMoney in tight value chains

               eMoney within value chains, although more efficient, is clearly not a silver bullet for creating digital liquidity.
               Besides having limited reach, value chains do not remove the incentive to cash-out to any meaningful degree.

               Given these limitations, is there a role for tight value chains in creating digital liquidity? Is eMoney somehow
               less important to tight value chains?

               Part of a holistic approach to digital liquidity: One needs to look at payment-enabling these tight value chains
               as just one part of a holistic approach – an approach that considers the lifecycle of money and introduces
               solutions that encourage a digital version(s). A holistic approach gives the BoP ample opportunity to receive,
               retain, and pay with eMoney. Tight value chains can encourage eMoney adoption and inject eMoney into the
               local BoP economy, a requisite step for digital liquidity. Since participating SHFs generate a disproportionate
               amount of revenue and may employ others, their impact should be larger than their seven per cent market
               share suggests. But, value chains in themselves are not sufficient vehicles for digital liquidity. It is important
               to note that for value chains to fulfill their liquidity role, they should use the national payment system and not
               a proprietary solution (e-voucher, etc.).




                                                                                                       211
   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244