Page 72 - ITU Journal, ICT Discoveries, Volume 3, No. 1, June 2020 Special issue: The future of video and immersive media
P. 72

ITU Journal: ICT Discoveries, Vol. 3(1), June 2020



          [32]  Mikropoulos,  T.  A.,  &  Natsis,  A.  (2011)   [43] Graesser, A. C., Lu, S., Tanner Jackson, G., Hite
          Educational  virtual  environments:  A  ten-year     Mitchell, H., Ventura, M., Olney, A., & Louwerse, M.
          review  of  emperical  research  (1999-2009).        M.  (2004)  AutoTutor:  A  tutor  with  dialogue  in
          Computers    &     Education,   56,    759-780.      natural  language.  Behavior  Research  Methods,
          doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.020.                   Instruments,  &  Computers,  36(2),  180-192.
                                                               doi:10.3758/BF03195563.
          [33]  de  Back,  T.  T.,  Tinga,  A.  M.,  Nguyen,  P.,  &
          Louwerse,  M.  M.  (2019).  Benefits  of  immersive   [44] Louwerse, M. M., Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D.
          collaborative learning in CAVE-based virtual reality.   S., & Lu, S. (2009) Embodied conversational agents
          Manuscript submitted for publication.                as  conversational  partners.  Applied  Cognitive
                                                               Psychology, 23, 1244–1255. doi: 10.1002/acp.1527.
          [34]  Höffler,  T.  N.  (2010).  Spatial  ability:  Its
          influence on learning with visualizations – a meta-  [45]  Mikhail,  E.  M.,  Bethel,  J.  S.,  &  McGlone,  J.  C.
          analytic  review.  Educational  Psychology  Review,   (2001).  Introduction  to  modern  photogrammetry.
          22(3), 245-269.                                      New York.
          [35]  Alhalabi,  W.  (2016)  Virtual  reality  systems   [46] Wang, Y., Skerry-Ryan, R. J., Stanton, D., Wu, Y.,
          enhance  students’  achievements  in  engineering    Weiss, R. J., Jaitly, N., ... & Le, Q. (2017). Tacotron:
          education.  Behaviour  &  Information  Technology,   Towards  end-to-end  speech  synthesis.  arXiv
          35(11),              919-925.               doi:     preprint arXiv:1703.10135.
          10.1080/0144929X.2016.1212931.
                                                               [47]  Jurafsky,  D.  (2000).  Speech  &  language
          [36] Roussou, M., & Slater, M. (2017). Comparison of   processing. Pearson Education.
          the  effect  of  interactive  versus  passive  virtual   [48] Tinga, A. M., de Back, T. T., & Louwerse, M. M.
          reality learning activities in evoking and sustaining   (2019). Non-invasive neurophysiological measures
          conceptual change. IEEE Transactions on emerging     of  learning:  A  meta-analysis.  Neuroscience  and
          Topics        in         Computing.         doi:     Biobehavioral    Reviews,    99,   59-89.    doi:
          10.1109/TETC.2017.2737983.
                                                               10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.02.001.
          [37] Fowler, C. (2015). Virtual reality and learning:   [49]  Shute,  V.  J.,  &  Ventura,  M.  (2013).  Stealth
          Where  is  the  pedagogy?  British  Journal  of      assessment:  Measuring and supporting learning in
          Educational Technology, 46(2), 412-422.
                                                               video games. MIT Press.
          [38]  Tullis, J. G., & Benjamin, A. S. (2011). On  the   [50] Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R., Bard, E. G., & Jeuniaux,
          effectiveness  of  self-paced  learning.  Journal  of   P.  (2012)  Behavior  matching  in  multimodal
          memory and language, 64(2), 109-118.
                                                               communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science,
          [39] Graesser, A. C., VanLehn, K., Rosé, C. P., Jordan,   36,   1404–1426,   doi:     10.1111/j.1551-
          P.  W.,  &  Harter,  D.  (2001).  Intelligent  tutoring   6709.2012.01269.x.
          systems with conversational dialogue. AI magazine,   [51] Schneider, W., & Chein, J. M. (2003). Controlled
          22(4), 39-39.
                                                               &  automatic  processing:  Behavior,  theory,  and
          [40] Sottilare, R., Graesser, A. C., Hu, X., & Sinatra, A.   biological  mechanisms.  Cognitive  Science,  27(3),
          (2018).  Design  recommendations  for  intelligent   525-559. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2703_8.
          tutoring systems. Team Science, 6.
                                                               [52]  Schnotz,  W.,  &  Kurschner,  C.  (2007).  A
          [41]  Weizenbaum,  J.  (1966).  ELIZA---  A  computer   reconsideration   of   cognitive   load   theory.
          program  for  the  study  of  natural  language      Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 469-508. doi:
          communication  between  man  and  machine.           10.1007/s10648-007-9053-4.
          Communications of the ACM, 9(1), 36-45.
                                                               [53] Koedinger, K. R., D’Mello, S., McLaughlin, E. A.,
          [42] Graesser, A. C., Lu, S., Jackson, G. T., Mitchell, H.   Pardos, Z. A., & Rosé, C. P. (2015) Data mining and
          H., Ventura, M., Olney, A., & Louwerse, M. M. (2004).   education.  WIREs  Cogn  Sci  2015,  6,  333–353.  doi:
          AutoTutor:  A  tutor  with  dialogue  in  natural    10.1002/wcs.1350.
          language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments,
          & Computers, 36(2), 180-192.









          50                                    © International Telecommunication Union, 2020
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77